steelydave said:Well, I just gave the SACD a quick listen on the little Sony mini-system in my bedroom, and it's everything you've been expecting. Vocals in the center speaker, drums in the front, and all the other instruments and voices equally spread around the room. Lots of discrete stuff in the rears which is a relief after the tame surround mix on Knopfler's Shangri-La album. They seem to have slightly de-80's-ified the production of the album, with the drums especially sounding more lifelike. I can't wait to crank this one up on my main system tomorrow!
Dave.
JonUrban said:PS - Don't bother with the "Ltd Ed". The real SACD is in the standard rounded corner jewel box, which to me is much better than the digipak of the Ltd one.
Guy Robinson said:Is the packaging the only difference though?
BananaSlug said:So, from your positive reaction it looks like we can assume that the sound quality is not an issue with this release? Only wondering as I see that it was originally recorded at 16/44.1
John the Depot Dude said:From http://www.sa-cd.net/showthread/6708//y?page=first
Mixing: "Brothers in Arms"
My buddy Chuck Ainlay spent about three months doing the surround mix on this at Mark Knopfler's surround room in London. Chuck has been working with Mark on all his projects for quite some time.
Anyone that knows Chuck's surround mixing work knows he will bring "BIA" to a whole new level of listening experience. Chuck described Mark's room, equipped with a full surround ATC scm-300 monitor system, as the best surround room he ever worked in. He was thrilled with the results he was getting from the masters and the system.
To those that think mixing from a 44.1 16-bit source will not yield any advantages over the original, consider this: D/A technology and quality has come a L-O-N-G way since "BIA" was originally produced. Far more resolution is possible now from the source than what the original D/As were capable of back then. Additionally, the new surround mix was performed in the analog domain - not through a 44.1 digital mixer! Chuck would have made full use of every great analog and/or digital tool at his disposal during the surround mix.
I, for one, will be anxiously awaiting MY copy of "Brothers in Arms," which I'm certain I'll use as a surround playback reference source.
Best Regards,
Michael Bishop
Recording Engineer
JonUrban said:This is one of the finest SACDs I have ever heard. I was literally blown off my couch! WOW!
From the first opening notes of "So Far Away" I knew this was something special. This is music that I knew well, yet, as Bobou2 has posted above, it was a totally new listen.
The mix is incredible. No gimmicks, just a super wide soundfield that brings out every detail that is imaginable. The intros are quite impressive. Aside from the "Money for Nothing" intro, which sounds like you want it to, the intro to "Ride Across the River" is equally impressive.
I can't get over how great this disc is. I have to listen to it more, and more, and more.
Price is not an issue, if you have an SACD player, you HAVE to have this SACD.
If anyone hears this on a good system, and listens to the 5.1 mix, they will never go back to stereo. This will be my new #1 5.1 demo disc. No doubt about it.
PS - Don't bother with the "Ltd Ed". The real SACD is in the standard rounded corner jewel box, which to me is much better than the digipak of the Ltd one.
GO GET THIS SACD, AND PREPARE TO SMILE!