Please post your comments, thoughts and observations.......
Last edited:
neil wilkes said:I like this album. There is not a bad track on it, and it grabs you right from the start with the single from it.
Again - only Dolby Digital (lose one mark) and a basic still for each track - lose another mark. If this were high Res or DTS I can understand the poor visuals, but they used DD so there is plenty of room. I mean, why do a dual disc with Redbook on one side and 16/48 LPCM on the other?
What is the point?
Why not give us High Res and/or DTS as well as the Dolby?
Score bonus points for the video content, but lose them again for it being in stereo only.
I know that it is Sony - but still.
PLEASE - get it right guys. This could have been a perfect 10, but prejudicial treatment by the label loses marks.
Patrick Cleasby said:Mine hasn't arrived yet - what's the mix like Neil? Who did it?
neil wilkes said:It was mixed by someone called Jeremy Wheatley for 365 artists. Never heard of him myself.
The mix itself is very good - but I am biased as I really like this album. It ranges from almost traditional to downright aggressive in it's execution.
It is a crying shame we only have a Dolby Digital version, as to me it is lacking in open ness and air - although I strongly suspect this is due to the compression muddying things up somewhat.
Better than expected all around; catchy songs, good use of surround.
I'm going to look for the SACD and upgrade!
If you find it - please let me know where.
It's never been available in the Uk at all......
If you find it - please let me know where.
It's never been available in the Uk at all......
Disclaimer: I am an anti-Duran Duran fan. I despised their 80's output and met this new release with more than a bucketful of trepidation. The fool I am, I bought the damn thing only for the surround tracks. It's true, I'd buy a recording of a moose pissing in a river if it were released in surround-sound. So sue me. A nod to our Canadian friends for those scratching their heads over that rather odd image...
Ah, but I digress... "Astronaut" finds the band as formulaic as ever, but at least it is a new, more palatable formula (at least for this ol' curmudgeon). Yep, the band so bad they had to be named twice have matured... for the better, I'd say, for what that's worth.
The first two cuts are pretty damn enjoyable, I must say, in a guilty-pleasure sort of way, especially "Want You More!", which is much better than it has a right to be. It degenerates from there but picks back up by the fifth cut... dammit, why does "Bedroom Toys" have to be so catchy? My brain says no but my feet say yes!
Track 6, "Nice", still finds the band as formulaic as ever... but damn, that groove won't let me go! WTF! I'm not supposed to like this!
Okay! I admit it! I like this disc! I'm even more embarrassed to admit that I like a Duran Duran disc than I am to admit I like a Britney Spears disc. Ah, but track 7 is pretty bad. Make that REALLY bad <SKIP>
It's pretty much downhill for the remaining five tracks, except for the last two tracks, with their lush, hypnotic production.
What pulls this release up from mediocrity is the very excellent technical production and near-excellent surround mix. I wanted to hate this disc but can't quite bring myself to. Something other than a lame Dolby Digital presentation would have been greatly appreciated.
Four points. Considering all the variables, this is a compliment indeed.