According to Wikipedia:
"Quadraphonic open reel tape (Q4)
The first medium for four-channel sound was reel-to-reel tape... introduced to the American market by the Vanguard Recording Society in June 1969 as "Quadraphonic open reel tape (Q4)" tapes.
Quadraphonic 8-Track Tape (Q8)
RCA Records followed, in April 1970, with its announcement of a four-channel version of the 8-track tape, named Quad-8 or Quadraphonic 8-Track Tape (later shortened to just Q8). These eventually appeared in Sept. 1970."
Folks, we are soon to enter the era where individual quad mixes will celebrate the 50th anniversary of their release. I wonder if the 50 year copyright expiration would apply to a unique version of a given work?
I want to be very careful here, because I want to respect the works of recording artists and do not wish to advocate piracy in any form. With that said, if the copyright on a work expires after 50 years, as has been discussed elsewhere, would the industry not be motivated to re-release some of their quad mixes in some form in order to reestablish their copyrights of the work?
If a court were to recognize quad recordings as being substantially different enough from the stereo counterpart, would the copyright issue not open the floodgates for at least limited official releases of many classic quad recordings?
Discussion please.
"Quadraphonic open reel tape (Q4)
The first medium for four-channel sound was reel-to-reel tape... introduced to the American market by the Vanguard Recording Society in June 1969 as "Quadraphonic open reel tape (Q4)" tapes.
Quadraphonic 8-Track Tape (Q8)
RCA Records followed, in April 1970, with its announcement of a four-channel version of the 8-track tape, named Quad-8 or Quadraphonic 8-Track Tape (later shortened to just Q8). These eventually appeared in Sept. 1970."
Folks, we are soon to enter the era where individual quad mixes will celebrate the 50th anniversary of their release. I wonder if the 50 year copyright expiration would apply to a unique version of a given work?
I want to be very careful here, because I want to respect the works of recording artists and do not wish to advocate piracy in any form. With that said, if the copyright on a work expires after 50 years, as has been discussed elsewhere, would the industry not be motivated to re-release some of their quad mixes in some form in order to reestablish their copyrights of the work?
If a court were to recognize quad recordings as being substantially different enough from the stereo counterpart, would the copyright issue not open the floodgates for at least limited official releases of many classic quad recordings?
Discussion please.