You can only choose one channel as master, which one is irrelevant as it corrects the differences caused by timing errors - and quite often there's an error between the front channels too.Why is the Left Front being taken as a master as opposed to say the Right Front?
Why not the front pair - surely this would be more accurate?
Though the value seems to be quite small, it may cause audible effects. "The resulting distortion of the phase relationships between the signals and the consequent filtering effect cause many problems including loss of high frequencies, muddy bass, poor mono compatibility, and a general smearing of the image. Worse still, if the timing error is not constant, you can hear a flanging effect." (Cedar Audio about CAM9 Phase Corrector)As I said though, I am not familiar with this so probably just don't understand.
135 microseconds will not produce any audible artefacts - we're talking just 135 millionths of a second here.
Well, you can't set delays shorter than samples and you are forced to use this grid then. It's not my problem anyway as I use Cedar's Phase Corrector - but as the error obviously gets introduced by the processing, I only wondered if there's a way to avoid it.If it really worries you, correct it using your DAW & delay/advance the files.
True, but it's the small differences that produce the most awful comb filter cancellations - and you would not be able to get rid of the error by buying better speakers then.With music, you also need to remember that your loudspeakers will introduce a phase discrepancy greater than this between woofer & tweeter.
Hi Kempfand, I think there is an error in your QS-script. After decoding the Ls - Rs pair are in opposite phase. They should be in phase, though. Could you have a look at the script, I tried, but I can't read it. Regards.
Oops, hold on, I think I made a mistake myself.
2) You are missing one of the components to run the script (i.e the graphic phase shifter). This probably is not the case with the QS script but it has happened to me with the SQ script.Collection: QS_dec_AA3_v1_
Title: QS_03_high
Description:
Mode: 1
Undo: 0
cmd: Channel Both
cmd: Command 1100
1: e:\QStest\LF Rs.wav
2:
Selected: 0 to 518400000 SR 96000
Freq: Off
Comment: Stereo Imagery\Channel Mixer
cmd: {EA93BBBE-0B8F-47D6-AC6D-B67B456D6843}
1: 24,Ð㶀Ęäq€ëåÁ“ùßÐ㶀ëåÁ
2:
3: 6
4: 0
5: 0
6: 2012696
7: 0
8: 0
9: 0
10: 1
Freq: Off
cmd: Channel Right
Freq: Off
cmd: Command 3100
Freq: Off
cmd: Channel Both
Freq: Off
Comment: Stereo Imagery\Center Channel Extractor
cmd: {EA93BBBE-0B8F-47D6-AC6D-B67B45747845}
1: 68,AAÁ€AAÁ€Ďčč}AAAÛÚÚAAAAAAAAćxyAAÁ€AAA€AAA€AAA€Ôđ*~Ž¯´€ëåÁëåÁķBą~
2:
3: 17
4: 0
5: 0
6: 177614080
7: 0
8: 0
9: 0
10: 1
Freq: Off
cmd: Channel Right
Freq: Off
cmd: Command 3100
Freq: Off
cmd: Channel Both
Freq: Off
Comment: Stereo Imagery\Center Channel Extractor
cmd: {EA93BBBE-0B8F-47D6-AC6D-B67B45747845}
1: 68,AAÁ€AAÁ€Ďčč}AAAÛÚÚAAAAAAAAćxyAAÁ€AAA€AAA€AAA€Ôđ*~Ž¯´€ëåÁëåÁķBą~
2:
3: 17
4: 0
5: 0
6: 177628944
7: 0
8: 0
9: 0
10: 1
Freq: Off
cmd: Command 1100
1: e:\QStest\Ls RF.wav
2:
Selected: 0 to 518400000 SR 96000
Freq: Off
Comment: Stereo Imagery\Channel Mixer
cmd: {EA93BBBE-0B8F-47D6-AC6D-B67B456D6843}
1: 24,Ð㶀“ùßëåÁĘäq€Ð㶀ëåÁ
2:
3: 6
4: 0
5: 0
6: 238689896
7: 0
8: 0
9: 0
10: 1
Freq: Off
cmd: Channel Left
Freq: Off
cmd: Command 3100
Freq: Off
cmd: Channel Both
Freq: Off
Comment: Stereo Imagery\Center Channel Extractor
cmd: {EA93BBBE-0B8F-47D6-AC6D-B67B45747845}
1: 68,AAÁ€AAÁ€Ďčč}AAAÛÚÚAAAAAAAAćxyAAÁ€AAA€AAA€AAA€Ôđ*~Ž¯´€ëåÁëåÁķBą~
2:
3: 17
4: 0
5: 0
6: 177730144
7: 0
8: 0
9: 0
10: 1
Freq: Off
cmd: Channel Left
Freq: Off
cmd: Command 3100
Freq: Off
cmd: Channel Both
...is there anywhere I can go to get a free copy of Adobe Audition...
Hi Guys,
Thanks so much for this, its greatly appreciated the time and effort that you guys have clearly put into the work here.
Just wondering is there anyweher i can get a free copy of adobe auditions or would i have to go to adobe site and pay for it?
thanks
No, I am convinced. The basic QS decoding does treat the phase of the rear channels correctly, (I mean they are in phase, allthough both of them should be inverted in respect to the front channels), but the expansion of the channel separation puts the rear pair in opposite phase.
Enter your email address to join: