Edit: I did read the book. Nice big text!!!
Yes, I too very much appreciate the big text in the book!!!
Edit: I did read the book. Nice big text!!!
I agree!Yes, I too very much appreciate the big text in the book!!!
Funny...Tonight, playing it after listening to some other stuff, it does indeed exhibit a hot high end. Ditto with the stereo layer. Time to rip the disc and mess with the EQ.My copy just arrived and yikes, the mastering on the 5.1 is a huge disappointment. The high end is goosed to the point of harshness. They managed to suck all the warmth out of it. Oh well, at least I have my trusty old MFSL vinyl. Hopefully the live discs will be worth the purchase.
Funny...Tonight, playing it after listening to some other stuff, it does indeed exhibit a hot high end. Ditto with the stereo layer. Time to rip the disc and mess with the EQ.
One advantage to getting old and having your hearing go down the tubes - you don't even hear these releases with maxed top end. If you can't hear it, it doesn't exist - for you!
Um, would that be me? I took the 22kHz - 8kHz high frequency test this afternoon and I can hear the 11kHz tone, but no higher. (Same as a couple of years ago.) However, I didn't notice the annoying high-end boost on the album as noted by Jonathan and Dave...Perhaps a blessing because it sounds very nice to my old ears.
This is interesting to think about. Did they do some sort of focus group and found out not many people under 50 would want to buy this set, so maybe they went and jacked up the EQ to make it sound pleasant for them? Everyone loses high end as they age, so they found the "sweet spot" for what is lost and boosted that? Kind of a crazy conspiracy to think about and if true, is really dumb to do....or if they can hear fine and they're mastering with a listener lacking in top-end hearing in mind, but it seems entirely unnecessary either way...
Reading through and catching up on this thread has been depressing. My copy has been stuck in Chicago for about a week now but I am not really looking forward to this now.
I usually just scan them into a file and blow them up on my computer as big as needed.Yes, I too very much appreciate the big text in the book!!!
AMEN to that JonOne advantage to getting old and having your hearing go down the tubes - you don't even hear these releases with maxed top end. If you can't hear it, it doesn't exist - for you!
It is similar to the trough recommended by @sjcorne but with a -6dB cut centered at 8kHz.
It must be me but I find there is too much in the center speaker and it narrows down the front soundscape considerably.
The rears seem fine so it comes across like I am sitting in the center of cone. If that makes any sense?
It must be me but I find there is too much in the center speaker and it narrows down the front soundscape considerably.
The rears seem fine so it comes across like I am sitting in the center of cone. If that makes any sense?
I have only gotten the chance to listen to both mixes twice but at low volumes.
Man that brings back some great memories. My dad had some AR 3s. They were mounted horizontally on table legs. Not sure why he did that or if they we’re sold that way. He passed them on to me and I used them vertically. I had them until the mid 70s. Sorry for straying from the subject.In an attempt to lose my mind, I started playing around with the EQ on a couple of songs: Lord Grenville and Sand In Your Shoes. Unfortunately, a one-size-fits-all approach may not be optimal for this album. But I have to settle on one curve because after seven iterations on Lord Grenville, I don't want to hear it again for about a year. So here is my preferred EQ curve that I will use on all tracks except Year Of The Cat, which will get special treatment because it sounds "less hot" than all of the other cuts. It is similar to the trough recommended by @sjcorne but with a -6dB cut centered at 8kHz.
View attachment 65729
Your thoughts and ideas are greatly appreciated.
Disclaimers:
- I don't hear anything above 11kHz.
- Beware that I'm am old Acoustic Research (AR) guy. The other "medicare eligible" folks on this site will understand the connotation.
Ill have to try it.... at low volume ill bet the 5.1 sounds good. Too bad i cant play it at that low a volume.thanks @sjcorne - Maybe it was the low volume I was playing it at. It was late at night and my wife was extra cranky the last few days
In an attempt to lose my mind, I started playing around with the EQ on a couple of songs: Lord Grenville and Sand In Your Shoes. Unfortunately, a one-size-fits-all approach may not be optimal for this album. But I have to settle on one curve because after seven iterations on Lord Grenville, I don't want to hear it again for about a year. So here is my preferred EQ curve that I will use on all tracks except Year Of The Cat, which will get special treatment because it sounds "less hot" than all of the other cuts. It is similar to the trough recommended by @sjcorne but with a -6dB cut centered at 8kHz.
Your thoughts and ideas are greatly appreciated.
Disclaimers:
- I don't hear anything above 11kHz.
- Beware that I'm am old Acoustic Research (AR) guy. The other "medicare eligible" folks on this site will understand the connotation.
Geez..I better open mine up to see if this is also happening with the discs.Mine arrived yesterday from Deep Discount and ALL the discs were scrambled into a pile instead of in their respective slots! Not Deep Discount's fault but rather the flimsy poor excuse for disc holders. The exterior box was in perfect condition!
In an attempt to lose my mind,