Neon Kitten
Member
The DVD-A should have been authored to give us easy access to the various tracks available - hirez 2.0, DD, DTS, etc. Simply a mis-judgement, and poor execution.
As is the dreadfully placed layer change in the 5.1 hi-res mix. With just a little bit of care it would have been completely transparent.
The fact that the dual-layered disc is authored as a PTP (Parallel Track Path) disc is unforgiveable, too - it pretty much guarantees a layer change break on every player, as the player needs to search back to the centre of the disc again to find the start of the second layer.
Oh, and just out of interest, the DVD-Video section of the disc is completely free of any kind of copy protection. I found that extremely surprising, but that, combined with the fact that the dual-layer format is wrong, has me thinking that the final disc master was not prepared by an experienced production house. Perhaps it was even done in-house.
Video/onscreen? Unless they went whole-hog and did a visual presentation unique to the DVD distribution that equalled the live production, we shouldn't care.
There's a lot that can be done with on-screen graphics on DVD-Audio - different graphics for each track, timed fades between them etc etc - and it's not hard to do. Several people I've played the disc to have commented "it's a bit boring having that yellow screen there all the time!"
See the Nine Inch Nails "With Teeth" DVD-A for an example of how it CAN be done.
The worst thing about the Love 5.1 mix? The use of the LFE channel. The Martins have used the LFE channel to double certain elements and instruments from time to time.
It might not be apparent, but the fundamental misunderstanding of this feature by the Martins has doomed this mix to sound different on the vast majority of systems compared to their reference system.
Precisely, and that's why I don't feel the LFE channel has ANY place in a multichannel music mix. Dolby, incidentally, agrees with me and has recommended for years that the LFE channel not be used for music.