Digging into old gear can be quite the adventure! I'm glad to see you're making progress on this project.
I have a 4401 that has the original CD module. I was surprised when I opened it the first time to see that the "daughter" board on the CD module was obviously not Bose quality. Phenolic board instead of the Bose green G10 boards and neat layout. I had a guy in Canada rework mine with new op amps, resistors, caps etc except for the CD board.
After some research, I found a japanese page (thanks to Google translation) with a TDM-20 demodulator, which seems to be a compatible, but slightly simplified version of the TDM-19.
These japanese guys took the TDM-20 board from an unnamed receiver to repair an older JVC CD-4 demodulator:
http://tangodelic2.cocolog-nifty.com/tangodelog/2021/04/post-983096.html
View attachment 90353
If anybody knows more about a receiver with such a board, please let me know
Very interesting article, thanks for the post!I have a dead Bose 4401, of course its missing its demodulator... I was looking for a reference to a particular issue on demodulator crosstalk. Remembered a mention. II dug up someones scan of Audio Magazine November 1976. I actually bought this copy in paper. I had the entire PDF, but I've sliced out just the article. Its on Building Latest CD-4 Demodulator.
JVC created a TDM-29C and with outside help, supplied it as a kit to electronic enthusiasts. A fully assembled JVC TDM-29C card was included with a circuit board for a high gain phono preamp to match its latest CD-4 Demodulator. I've never seen mention of the TDM-29C. I thought to myself this thread might enjoy this PDF.
Hi,Hi friends
Has anybody a (hopefully good) picture of the rare BOSE 4401 CD-4 demodulator? I would like to see this board, if its worth searching or rebuilding. Of course, I would like to buy one, if somebody likes to sell (I offer 1k $ or € ;-)
I am restoring currently my Bose 4401; and have already added in the Involve SQ and QS (compatible) Decoders, made from their evaluation kits. I have added a separate power supply and shielding, since the built in power circuit is not capable to supply these boards with their hungry TI signal processor. The Involve boards are slightly modfied (that means, several parts ripped of) and mounted on two carrier boards with suitable Molex connectors. The Molex are still under manufacturing; even with gold plated springs inside.
Beside the usual replacing of the caps, resistors (the old ones drift over the time), chips sockets, RCA sockets and semiconductors, I changed the gain of the last stage. It is by far to high (in my opinion); with my setup I could barely use the first 90° of the 270° volume poti. And with full volume (at 270°), there is a very noticeable noise and hum in the loudspeakers. So lowering the gain by changing the feedback resistors in the last stage is the first step. Lowering the noise will be another goal. Replacing the volume poti will be the last goal.
The opamps are already replaced with NE5532D - still the best. OPA 2134 work as well, but OPA2604 or exotic Oraclell-02 do not work well. And there is no audible difference between old and new RC4136.
I add some pictures, maybe somebody has fun.
Best regards
KM
That’s going to take a bit of study on my part, but it looks pretty interesting.I have a dead Bose 4401, of course its missing its demodulator... I was looking for a reference to a particular issue on demodulator crosstalk. Remembered a mention. II dug up someones scan of Audio Magazine November 1976. I actually bought this copy in paper. I had the entire PDF, but I've sliced out just the article. Its on Building Latest CD-4 Demodulator.
JVC created a TDM-29C and with outside help, supplied it as a kit to electronic enthusiasts. A fully assembled JVC TDM-29C card was included with a circuit board for a high gain phono preamp to match its latest CD-4 Demodulator. I've never seen mention of the TDM-29C. I thought to myself this thread might enjoy this PDF.
And there was a format war for that, too! CBS had a system that was out before WWII, but RCA’s NTSC got the nod here. Of course, PAL and SECAM never went away until the world went digital. Somehow we got color TV.It really annoys me that while quad equipment was starting to mature and beginning to get really good it was suddenly abandoned by most equipment and record labels. What were they thinking?! Again think of the colour tv analogy. We would still be living with black and white TV if the industry would've gave up so fast!
So colour started before WWII, was introduced in Canada in the mid sixties but not really a thing until the early 1970's! An extremely long run until it was finally accepted!And there was a format war for that, too! CBS had a system that was out before WWII, but RCA’s NTSC got the nod here. Of course, PAL and SECAM never went away until the world went digital. Somehow we got color TV.
I don’t really know about Canada, but WWII pretty m uch brought consumer electronics to a halt world-wide.So colour started before WWII, was introduced in Canada in the mid sixties but not really a thing until the early 1970's! An extremely long run until it was finally accepted!
Bonanza was colour in the late 50's, pushed by NBC. CBS was more reluctant. Superman as well switched to colour production in anticipation that it would be more accepted in the future.I don’t really know about Canada, but WWII pretty m uch brought consumer electronics to a halt world-wide.
Star Trek debuted in the mid 1960s, and it was in color.
SECAM was a total pain, video faders were much more complex because just fading the entire composite signal as you could with NTSC or PAL screwed up the colour with SECAM.And there was a format war for that, too! CBS had a system that was out before WWII, but RCA’s NTSC got the nod here. Of course, PAL and SECAM never went away until the world went digital. Somehow we got color TV.
NTSC was also known as "Never Twice the Same Colour".SECAM was a total pain, video faders were much more complex because just fading the entire composite signal as you could with NTSC or PAL screwed up the colour with SECAM.
SECAM was often referred to as ‘Something Essentially Contrary to the American Method.”NTSC was also known as "Never Twice the Same Colour".
Enter your email address to join: