ANALOG Channel Reassignment Recommendations

QuadraphonicQuad

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Presumably because the track is no longer mediated through the limitations of the SQ encode and decode process. The mix was created with these limitations in mind. They probably "tested" the mix by encoding and decoding with two channel tape before pressing the vinyl. Remove the process and you hear the underlying and accurate mix that was used to achieve the final decoded effect.

My question would be this: was the same mix used for the 8 Track? The quad discography lists Ship Ahoy. Philidelphia International ZAQ-32408 (DQ8), and this was therefore a discrete quad mix. I do not have a transfer of the Q8. Knowing the tape would not be encoded and decoded, did they use the same mix as what came out on the SACD?

fwiw that bass still v.noticeably zig zags while the vocals pan 360 in the 4-ch's of the decoded SQ LP.
i can put up a brief clip or send one to anyone who is curious as to how the SQ compares to the Sony SACD which, while its never gonna rival the sound quality or separation of the SACD, is still, to me, pretty respectable.. the SQ makes a good fist of it imho and channel assignment the same on the decoded SQ output as the Sony SACD and that track on the AF V/A SACD.
 
Presumably because the track is no longer mediated through the limitations of the SQ encode and decode process. The mix was created with these limitations in mind. They probably "tested" the mix by encoding and decoding with two channel tape before pressing the vinyl. Remove the process and you hear the underlying and accurate mix that was used to achieve the final decoded effect.

My question would be this: was the same mix used for the 8 Track? The quad discography lists Ship Ahoy. Philidelphia International ZAQ-32408 (DQ8), and this was therefore a discrete quad mix. I do not have a transfer of the Q8. Knowing the tape would not be encoded and decoded, did they use the same mix as what came out on the SACD?

it certainly exists

http://www.8-track-shack.com/the-ojays-ship-ahoy-quadraphonic-p-163905.html
 
OK, but on a truly discrete presentation, like the DVD-A and the track on 'The Collection', it doesn't end up sounding at all like a mono 'quad center'. My seat is in the 'quad center' (equal real or virtual distance from the four quad speakers, whicha re level matched). THe opening of 'For the Love of Money' sounds like....bass zigzagging diagonally. Highly directional.

'For The Love Of Money' doesn't feature any diagonally panned phantom center placements. The bass zigzagging diagonally actually makes logical sense, because each time the riff plays, it alternates between being bathed in reverb and being completely dry - so it goes front left (reverby) -> front right (dry) -> rear left (reverby) -> rear right (dry, where it stays for the remainder of the song). The net result is that the reverbed bass is confined to the left side of the room and the dry bass to the the right side.

Most of the other tracks on Ship Ahoy feature some diagonally derived 'quad center' placement:

1 Put Your Hands Together (bass guitar FL & SR)
2 Ship Ahoy (bass guitar FL & SR)
3 This Air I Breathe (backing vocals FL & SR during outro)
4 You Got Your Hooks In Me (low backing vocalist FL & SR)
5 For The Love Of Money (nothing 'quad center' as mentioned)
6 Now That We Found Love (bass drum & backing vocals FL & SR)
7 Don't Call Me Brother (low backing vocalist FL & SR)
8 People Keep Tellin' Me (backing vocals FL & SR)

If you don't have this disc, the Isley Bros. 'That Lady' track on the AF Collection disc is a good example of diagonally panned 'quad center' placement, the lead guitar is panned like that on the song, in the front left and rear right channels.


Regarding the SQ and 4-channel master tapes, both were created simultaneously from the same mixing session. They ran two tape decks - a 15ips 4-track for the discrete 4-channel master, and at the same time, the 4 channel outputs from the board were fed to an SQ encoder which was routed in to a 15ips 2-track tape deck for the SQ encoded master. When mixes were completed, safety copies of both the quad and SQ masters were made and stored in Sigma's vault, while the original masters went to the label. So presumably now Sony should have two copies of all the discrete masters of all the PIR quad releases, as their tape vault was cleaned out and safety masters were returned to parent labels (along with 6,000 unclaimed tapes going to Drexel University's audio archive) when the studio went out of business a decade or so ago.

The reason they didn't just make a 4-channel discrete master and then use it to create the SQ master (ie 4 channel deck -> SQ encoder -> 2 channel deck) was that CBS felt that the less number of tape generations and other things in the signal chain, the less chance there would be of anything interfering with the phase information that was inherent in the SQ encoding. To that end, the PIR LP's were mastered and cut flat, with little or no EQ and no compression at the behest of CBS - I guess you'd presume all the CBS subsidiary labels (Columbia, Epic, Blue Sky, etc.) were probably done this way if they were advising PIR to do that.

Sigma Sound did have the facility to monitor in real-time what their mixes sounded like decoded SQ (ie the routing would take the 4 channel discrete output, encode and decode it) but Arthur told me that they abandoned referring to it very quickly, because in his words, decoded SQ 'sounded weird' no matter how they mixed. So their working practice was basically to adhere to the rules CBS had set down for SQ (nothing placed rear center, and reverbs could only emanate from the same location as what was creating them, ie if you had reverb on drums, and drums were in the front, the drum reverb could only be in the front too) but they treated the discrete 4-channel master as the definitive mix. They didn't go back and listen to the SQ decode and then change the discrete mix to try and eke more out of the SQ decode - they understood SQ was a flawed system and treated the SQ master as sort of an "it is what it is" proposition.
 
'For The Love Of Money' doesn't feature any diagonally panned phantom center placements. The bass zigzagging diagonally actually makes logical sense, because each time the riff plays, it alternates between being bathed in reverb and being completely dry - so it goes front left (reverby) -> front right (dry) -> rear left (reverby) -> rear right (dry, where it stays for the remainder of the song). The net result is that the reverbed bass is confined to the left side of the room and the dry bass to the the right side.

Most of the other tracks on Ship Ahoy feature some diagonally derived 'quad center' placement:

1 Put Your Hands Together (bass guitar FL & SR)
2 Ship Ahoy (bass guitar FL & SR)
3 This Air I Breathe (backing vocals FL & SR during outro)
4 You Got Your Hooks In Me (low backing vocalist FL & SR)
5 For The Love Of Money (nothing 'quad center' as mentioned)
6 Now That We Found Love (bass drum & backing vocals FL & SR)
7 Don't Call Me Brother (low backing vocalist FL & SR)
8 People Keep Tellin' Me (backing vocals FL & SR)

If you don't have this disc, the Isley Bros. 'That Lady' track on the AF Collection disc is a good example of diagonally panned 'quad center' placement, the lead guitar is panned like that on the song, in the front left and rear right channels.


Regarding the SQ and 4-channel master tapes, both were created simultaneously from the same mixing session. They ran two tape decks - a 15ips 4-track for the discrete 4-channel master, and at the same time, the 4 channel outputs from the board were fed to an SQ encoder which was routed in to a 15ips 2-track tape deck for the SQ encoded master. When mixes were completed, safety copies of both the quad and SQ masters were made and stored in Sigma's vault, while the original masters went to the label. So presumably now Sony should have two copies of all the discrete masters of all the PIR quad releases, as their tape vault was cleaned out and safety masters were returned to parent labels (along with 6,000 unclaimed tapes going to Drexel University's audio archive) when the studio went out of business a decade or so ago.

The reason they didn't just make a 4-channel discrete master and then use it to create the SQ master (ie 4 channel deck -> SQ encoder -> 2 channel deck) was that CBS felt that the less number of tape generations and other things in the signal chain, the less chance there would be of anything interfering with the phase information that was inherent in the SQ encoding. To that end, the PIR LP's were mastered and cut flat, with little or no EQ and no compression at the behest of CBS - I guess you'd presume all the CBS subsidiary labels (Columbia, Epic, Blue Sky, etc.) were probably done this way if they were advising PIR to do that.

Sigma Sound did have the facility to monitor in real-time what their mixes sounded like decoded SQ (ie the routing would take the 4 channel discrete output, encode and decode it) but Arthur told me that they abandoned referring to it very quickly, because in his words, decoded SQ 'sounded weird' no matter how they mixed. So their working practice was basically to adhere to the rules CBS had set down for SQ (nothing placed rear center, and reverbs could only emanate from the same location as what was creating them, ie if you had reverb on drums, and drums were in the front, the drum reverb could only be in the front too) but they treated the discrete 4-channel master as the definitive mix. They didn't go back and listen to the SQ decode and then change the discrete mix to try and eke more out of the SQ decode - they understood SQ was a flawed system and treated the SQ master as sort of an "it is what it is" proposition.

Thank you for typing this. It's fascinating to us interested in sound engineering.
 
'
Sigma Sound did have the facility to monitor in real-time what their mixes sounded like decoded SQ (ie the routing would take the 4 channel discrete output, encode and decode it) but Arthur told me that they abandoned referring to it very quickly, because in his words, decoded SQ 'sounded weird' no matter how they mixed. So their working practice was basically to adhere to the rules CBS had set down for SQ (nothing placed rear center, and reverbs could only emanate from the same location as what was creating them, ie if you had reverb on drums, and drums were in the front, the drum reverb could only be in the front too) but they treated the discrete 4-channel master as the definitive mix. They didn't go back and listen to the SQ decode and then change the discrete mix to try and eke more out of the SQ decode - they understood SQ was a flawed system and treated the SQ master as sort of an "it is what it is" proposition.

If I understand this, then, we can expect the Q8 of Ship Ahoy to also have the same diagonal bass pans on 'For the Love of Money' that are heard on the SQ LP and on the DVD-A.

And those pans are 'correct', i.e., the rear channels do not need to be swapped.
 
There's another one to add to the list....

Keane - Hopes & Fears (Fronts/Rears reversed)
Fix - https://www.quadraphonicquad.com/fo...nd-fears-sacd-dualdisc-dvd-a.4134/post-304619

And another couple while not technically channel reversals, have problems with the base in the mix?

George Benson - Breezin'
Fix - https://www.quadraphonicquad.com/fo...g-engineer-vol-1-george-benson-breezin.18643/

Coldplay - A Head Full Of Dreams
I have a sneaky feeling the LFE info was sent to the centre channel as well? It's totally out of whack in that channel, surely it can't be intentional?! :phones Would very much welcome a fix if anyone knows how to balance it out?
 
Coldplay - A Head Full Of Dreams
I have a sneaky feeling the LFE info was sent to the centre channel as well? It's totally out of whack in that channel, surely it can't be intentional?! :phones Would very much welcome a fix if anyone knows how to balance it out?
If it's truly the full LFE doubled in the center channel at the same level, then the LFE content could be removed from the center channel in a DAW or other audio editor using phase cancellation. Combine the center channel with a phase inverted LFE channel to create a new, LFE-less center channel.
 
Bumping this with info on how to repair Stormbringer. This turns a crappy dvd into a very nice quad mix. Thanks Steelydave!
Thanks for the info. I tried several times to extract the audio from my copy using DVD AE, and the weirdest thing kept happening: Tracks 1 and 9 were somehow "sped up" to where they sounded like Alvin and the Chipmunks. I've never experienced that before, and I checked with other discs and couldn't replicate the problem. Finally, I used MakeMKV to create an mkv file, which I split and converted to flac files using MMH (Thanks, Garry!). The track times don't really bother me, so I probably won't bother with them, but I'm thinking of deleting the center and LFE channels. I have subs, and none of my speakers are set to large, so the appropriate frequencies should still be sent to my subs.

The whole "Original Quad mix in 5.1" on this release was seriously messed up; that's for sure.
 
Gentle Giant - Free Hand [DVD-A]

Much controversy. Discussion?

Recommendation 1: Swap the right front & back
LF > LF (stays the same)
RF > RR
LR > LR (stays the same)
RR > RF
C > C
LFE > SW

Gentle Giant's "Free Hand" and "In'terview" coming on DVD audio in february..
________________________________________
Recommendation 2: Swap rears
LF > LF (stays the same)
RF > RF (stays the same)
LR > RR
RR > LR
C > C
LFE > SW


Gentle Giant's "Free Hand" and "In'terview" coming on DVD audio in february..
Gentle Giant's "Free Hand" and "In'terview" coming on DVD audio in february..
______________________________________
Recommendation 3: Not a complete rotation.
LF > RF
RF > RR
LR > LR (stays the same)
RR > LF
C > C
LFE > SW

Gentle Giant's "Free Hand" and "In'terview" coming on DVD audio in february..
Gentle Giant - Free Hand - to swap or not to swap?

(3rd one) What's recommended is:

"Move the front left to front right
Move the front right to rear right
Move the rear right to front left"

Bump?
 
I'm not exactly a fan of diagonal placements. I always figured it was done to satisfy some kind of SQ requirement. With relatively few exceptions, you never experience them outside a Columba/Epic title. Paul Simon's "Rhymin' Simon" album has quite a few with either drum or grand piano placement (see: "One Mans' Ceiling is another Mans' Floor); Labelles "Nightbirds" album; (see: "Lady Marmalade") Which is an absolute shame in my ears because if the drums were placed across the fronts like EVERY OTHER SONG ON THE ALBUM.... "Lady Marmalade" would be what I would consider a flawless Quad mix.

There are some diagonal placements on Elvis' "From Elvis in Memphis" Q8.... and I strongly believe this is a channel placement error. 9 out of 10 songs on the album feature Bass in FL and BR and drums in FR and BL. Problem is in my mind, the entire album comes from eight track multis.... drums and bass were only recorded to a single mono track each. Elvis' vocal is practically equal in all four channels. If you play around with the assignment to put drums in the rear, bass in the front.... it centers both almost too easily. Vocals remain the same. In a few instances you'll have to pair up strings and backing vocals but if you pair them up so they appear either in both lefts or both rights then the whole album falls into place and it *REALLY* does echo the stereo mixes but pulls it apart into four channels.

There is also something seriously wrong with the Q8. Some channels are delayed by 6-tenths of a second. The mix dropped by Sony for their 360RA format DOES NOT feature this delay. Swap channels on those mixes (as they still feature bass and drums split apart) and you get what I believe is the mixers original intention. It also helps my theory because other early RCA titles feature similar mixes with bass front center, and drums back center.
 
Labelles "Nightbirds" album; (see: "Lady Marmalade") Which is an absolute shame in my ears because if the drums were placed across the fronts like EVERY OTHER SONG ON THE ALBUM.... "Lady Marmalade" would be what I would consider a flawless Quad mix.
I'm not following you on this...what is wrong with drums spread across the fronts?
 
A diagonal split is the only way to put something approximately in the center of the room in SQ.
 
Back
Top