- Joined
- Jan 9, 2013
- Messages
- 26,110
Just to repeat...my post didn't deal with a lossy vs lossless debate...it was merely a rebuttal against those that just dismiss a title because it's not "hi rez"....and I and others have said over and over again that the mix and mastering is more important than the delivery system....you bring up an important point that I agree with...the attitude of entitlement...even though most of us know that the surround pool of potential buyers is a tiny segment of the market place..it doesn't stop people from complaining about not getting stand alone discs...and when you factor in the state of physical discs...we are lucky to get anything at this stage...even these deluxe sets...I don't see them being offered in a couple of years..
I don't think this is his best mix...but it certainly is the best version I have ever heard...
It's the same thing, Clint. Layla sounds great but I can ONLY imagine how it would sound in 96/24 and now that's it's going for $300+ as an OOP item.....even more worrisome! I've already been through the TULL lossy 5.1 versus 96/24 LOSSLESS Stereo Debate. The STEREO 96/24 BLOWS AWAY the LOSSY DTS 5.1. I can hear it......I can feel it......but my hands are tied.
People can spend their money any way they want. But it doesn't always mean they're making the right choices.
And in YOUR heart and MIND you know I'm right ....... but in this age of FAKE NEWS, I'm afraid my rationale is Gone With The Wind! And that ain't a good thing. What ever happened to the adage "Goodness/TRUTH OUTWILLS ALL?"
Last edited: