I and many others I'm sure have upmixed ISOTLC.I'm pretty sure that "official" release was not close to the quality of the upmix I mentioned.
I and many others I'm sure have upmixed ISOTLC.I'm pretty sure that "official" release was not close to the quality of the upmix I mentioned.
I was deejaying at a campus radio station in 1965/66, when “Go Now!” came out. Mono, of course, and before Justin showed up, but a great song that I played probably a bit too much.I really got into The Moody Blues in the very late 60's. You could say I lived and breathed them then. And although I've listened to a LOT of other great music in my lifetime, the Moodys are still closest to my heart. I guess it was the times, my age, etc.; it all came together back then. They are "officially" my favorite band when someone asks. I really can't say I have a favorite album. To me, the first 7 albums are inseparable; to be taken in as a whole. Listened to consecutively, in their entirety, in one session, is truly a Voyage; a "journey to the outer edges of your conciseness".
I always thought of the Moody Blues' music as a more intelligent form of rock. I've seen them in concert several times, always coming out feeling gratified. I took my sister to one of the concerts. She was in tears during "Nights in White Satin". I have all seven of the SACD's, and can only hope Universal will see their way clear to release the subsequent albums on BD-A.
As Far As I'm Concerned...the Moodies WERE THE KNIGHTS IN WHITE SATIN!The critics considered The Moody Blues music to be pompous, high-brow and snooty. That's one reason it took so long for them to be inducted into the R&R Hall of Fame. I think I'll go downstairs and listen to a bunch of their stuff right now.
60 Minutes used Question on a segment about world food waste back then.The critics considered The Moody Blues music to be pompous, high-brow and snooty. That's one reason it took so long for them to be inducted into the R&R Hall of Fame. I think I'll go downstairs and listen to a bunch of their stuff right now.
Yeah, well, what do the critics know?The critics considered The Moody Blues music to be pompous, high-brow and snooty. That's one reason it took so long for them to be inducted into the R&R Hall of Fame. I think I'll go downstairs and listen to a bunch of their stuff right now.
Amen Brother.Yeah, well, what do the critics know?
While we are discussing this, the Quad reel rip of A Question Of Balance has the rears boosted a bit. The SACD could use about a 3db boost of the rears in certain songs, but I need to go through it track by track.But these quad SACDs are the real deal! It's the original quad mixes, not 5.1 remixes. Transcode them properly and drop the C and Lfe channels and yo
Or Moody Blues fan.....I collected all the core 7 in the various forms SACD, DVD and DTS a few years ago. It took a while to find the good deals. I missed out on the Timeless Flight set! That set is going for so much money now it's not accessible. So, I have a few of their original vinyl, some recent re-issued vinyl, and all the rest in CD from the Octave album through the polydor years. I even have an autographed box set! I have some of the concert albums and compilations. I have some of the solo works. I enjoy them all. The core 7 are my favorite. Even more so in quad and 5.1! I guess you can say I'm aMoosy Blues fan.
But these quad SACDs are the real deal! It's the original quad mixes, not 5.1 remixes.
Does anybody else think the 5.1 releases aren't really 5.1? I don't think any of the "5.1" SACD's have a center channel or LFE....or is it my system?FWIW, the original quad mixes were created by Tony Clarke, whose contribution to the band's sound was so vital that he became known as the "sixth Moody Blue." There is no surround sound mix of the band's work that is going to sound more authentic than that. The SACDs, whose mixes were overseen by Justin Hayward, were simply minimal conversions of the quad mixes for 5.1.
They are definately formatted as 5.1. If whats actually in the CC and the LFE is anything worthwhile is a different question. Ive heard you can turn them off with no degredation to the presentation. Ive also heard they are at such a low level leaving them in dosent cause any degredation either.Does anybody else think the 5.1 releases aren't really 5.1? I don't think any of the "5.1" SACD's have a center channel or LFE....or is it my system?
There's absolutely nothing coming out of the center channel or the LFE. It's very simple to make a 5.1 mix with dummy/blank channels in the center channel and the LFE. I would check mine but I just sold them a few years ago.They are definately formatted as 5.1. If whats actually in the CC and the LFE is anything worthwhile is a different question. Ive heard you can turn them off with no degredation to the presentation. Ive also heard they are at such a low level leaving them in dosent cause any degredation either.
Yes. I found that turning off the center and LFE makes no difference on my set up. Now, if the Bills could find some way to turn off Mahomes and…oops, wrong thread.They are definately formatted as 5.1. If whats actually in the CC and the LFE is anything worthwhile is a different question. Ive heard you can turn them off with no degredation to the presentation. Ive also heard they are at such a low level leaving them in dosent cause any degredation either.
Enter your email address to join: