If mine had arrived upside down like yours...I'd be super pissed.Mine just arrived
If mine had arrived upside down like yours...I'd be super pissed.Mine just arrived
Even worse, he's going to have to listen while standing on his head to get the correct imaging.If mine had arrived upside down like yours...I'd be super pissed.
You must be joking …. This is cheap…see what you get for the same price with George Harrison ATMPUnfortunately, not priced for the common man.
What is the cost?You must be joking …. This is cheap…see what you get for the same price with George Harrison ATMP
$145 less 10% coupon @ import CDWhat is the cost?
I pre-ordered so $154….Amazon is asking $149 for ATMP$145 less 10% coupon @ import CD
Most likely cheaper because it was accidentally printed upside down on the cover.You must be joking …. This is cheap…see what you get for the same price with George Harrison ATMP
I’m not opening mine up not yet anyhow, I’ve got all the Multi’s that are available except for BSS the one from 2014 which I hear is inferior from the DVD-A from 2000 which I have multiple copies of in different formats. Just got it to actually see (eventually) if the BR disc sounds better then the DVD-A’s…let me know once you check yours out, but it’s just a REPRESS…so the error is still probably thereGot mine today as well. I'm scared to put the blu ray in to see if they corrected the mistake.
I'm no audiophile like some here, but I've yet to read about there being an audible difference between a blu ray and DVD or SACD if it's the same mastering/mix.I’m not opening mine up not yet anyhow, I’ve got all the Multi’s that are available except for BSS the one from 2014 which I hear is inferior from the DVD-A from 2000 which I have multiple copies of in different formats. Just got it to actually see (eventually) if the BR disc sounds better then the DVD-A’s…let me know once you check yours out, but it’s just a REPRESS…so the error is still probably there
Thanks for that ….. if one of you audiophiles out there can give a complete rundown between the BR/SACD & DVD-A’s please do soI'm no audiophile like some here, but I've yet to read about there being an audible difference between a blu ray and DVD or SACD if it's the same mastering/mix.
I am. As well as a recording engineer and sound guy. There is no difference if they hold the same master. Even with format transcode or sample rate conversion between those containers. Compare the result audio with null tests and it nulls down past -90db. (With the volume levels exactly matched between them. Should they be different out of the box.)I'm no audiophile like some here, but I've yet to read about there being an audible difference between a blu ray and DVD or SACD if it's the same mastering/mix.
So this was not fixed?! Dear lord. 100% just a repress with the same mix up with Bolero in the extra track section of Trilogy versus where it should be. . . This is so maddening. Why!?Anyway, I just checked. "Abaddon's Bolero" is still in the extra tracks section of Trilogy.
Probably left over press from original pressingSo this was not fixed?! Dear lord. 100% just a repress with the same mix up with Bolero in the extra track section of Trilogy versus where it should be. . . This is so maddening. Why!?
Seems your set was from AustraliaMine just arrived
Enter your email address to join: