its surprising to find the same chap who engineered the 5.1 on this SACD (John Porter) also did the Los Lonely Boys DualDisc because this isn't bad at all whereas the Los Lonely Boys 5.1 is an ambient Rears at best type mix and not worth picking up unless you don't have the album already.
taken as a whole, the mix here is quite pleasing, it comes across as sufficiently Surround-y and musically its all very pleasant too.
its a bit of a Pandora's Box delving into what's going on in the individual channels, since you then discover its far from a perfectly balanced mix, there's too much Full Range content in the LFE, not just low bass but the entire Bass Guitar is in there, i imagine on some setups this might cause some issues?
also, you find nothing is truly discrete since there's always some front-back and back-front blending going on, so things like BVs for example are more prominent in the Rears but they're also at a lower level in the Fronts.
speaking of the Fronts they sometimes clip because not only do they have the lion's share of the musical elements going on in them (lead vocal, lead instrument) than in any other channel but they are often significantly louder than the other channels.
do any of these drawbacks have a significant impact on the Surround enjoyment? for me, no, its all ok when you're in the sweet spot.
tbh in a way i wish i'd never started waveform-whispering this one because it sounds just fine as it is and given there's only so much could be done with sparse arrangements its more effectively Surround-y than any number of 5.1 discs from that timeframe.
"8".