I am now....
Can't beat some LS....in surround.
Can't beat some LS....in surround.
Simple Mind…listen to the picked part ( a Tele?) and the huge cymbal wash crashes.I am now....
Can't beat some LS....in surround.
Elliot is really a masterful surround mixer, I agree.I think I preferred Elliot Scheiner's 5.1 mixes of the same tracks on the Southern Surroundings DVD-A. Interesting that they appear to have found the multitrack for "Sweet Home Alabama" though.
I think I preferred Elliot Scheiner's 5.1 mixes of the same tracks on the Southern Surroundings DVD-A. Interesting that they appear to have found the multitrack for "Sweet Home Alabama" though.
Agreed....
has anyone listened to this? I’m giving it a listen today….typical of the strength of an ATMOS mix, you can really a lot of the details in the three guitar parts, and the piano in particular is essential to their sound but not always clearly heard in the past.
edit. Not all tracks in ATMOS
It has and it's a real good one. Lot's of guitars blasting out in the heights.This is the more complete Atmos collection for Lynyrd Skynyrd. I believe it has been out for some time...
It has and it's a real good one. Lot's of guitars blasting out in the heights.
Listening now, while watching the Bill's struggle
Always like to get it from the original album instead of a comp when available..
Oh boy, love that Eddie Money first record, and the two monster hits in ATMOS.Always like to get it from the original album instead of a comp when available..
Thanks for the tip on “Baby Hold On”. Didn’t realize that track received an Atmos mix.Oh boy, love that Eddie Money first record, and the two monster hits in ATMOS.
This is another ( of many, many) ATMOS mix that seems to reduce the power of the low end compared to the original stereo. I wonder why that is the case? Perhaps the spreading out of the musical elements to many more channels does it? I wonder why the mixers don’t take steps to fix this? I have found that after I calibrate my system with Audessey, I’ll manually boost the gain on my sub a smidge and that seems to help. Anyone have any thoughts?Always like to get it from the original album instead of a comp when available..
I think many of the problems associated with streaming titles result from the bit rate just not being up to digitizing more than two channels.This is another ( of many, many) ATMOS mix that seems to reduce the power of the low end compared to the original stereo. I wonder why that is the case? Perhaps the spreading out of the musical elements to many more channels does it? I wonder why the mixers don’t take steps to fix this? I have found that after I calibrate my system with Audessey, I’ll manually boost the gain on my sub a smidge and that seems to help. Anyone have any thoughts?
Maybe, but I still think a lot of the really egregious examples stem from poor mixing. INXS' Kick is one that made it to Blu-Ray, and it sounds just as bad as the stream to my ears. If you're starting out with something that was mixed competently (Grateful Dead, Tori Amos, Joni Mitchell, Tom Petty, etc), the low bitrate doesn't inflict such horrendous damage. I'll still take the lossless version though!I think many of the problems associated with streaming titles result from the bit rate just not being up to digitizing more than two channels.
I think you can mix around the bit rate problem to some degree by limiting the frequency bandwidth used by the surround channels. Grateful Dead and Tom Petty are great examples. Discrete placement is better; ambience is a waste of bits.Maybe, but I still think a lot of the really egregious examples stem from poor mixing. INXS' Kick is one that made it to Blu-Ray, and it sounds just as bad as the stream to my ears. If you're starting out with something that was mixed competently (Grateful Dead, Tori Amos, Joni Mitchell, Tom Petty, etc), the low bitrate doesn't inflict such horrendous damage. I'll still take the lossless version though!
Those mixes you mentioned don't seem to be limited in any channels in terms of frequency response. Are you making an assumption? I am getting nice low end all around with both of those mixes.I think you can mix around the bit rate problem to some degree by limiting the frequency bandwidth used by the surround channels. Grateful Dead and Tom Petty are great examples. Discrete placement is better; ambience is a waste of bits.
Enter your email address to join: