Companies follow money, they don’t do it at the present time because they don’t see the money in it but it doesn’t mean the money might not be there.
Unless you're talking about the same people we are - the audiophiles and their capitalist relatives who don't CARE if a project is going to bring in any money or not.
Just like the vast majority of book, record and antique dealers, most of which at least in my experience got their money elsewhere and just have the shop to have something to do in their retirement - and to have a tax write off.
The idea is not farfetched. We are on this website for a reason, which means there is a need/want. It just needs to be monetized and then the companies would flock to it. The problem is to figure out how to monetize it and make it relevant.
Hopefully by some of the same people that patronize and subsidize the arts, fund the Smithsonian and Library of Congress, or support the research on old media being done by Carl Haber et al at the Lawrence Berkeley National Labs.
...because the number of recordings is limited?
Not if we have something to say about it.
Combination CD-4 45LP and DMM.
We posted this on the Lathe Troll forum as well since it has to do with cutting, but basically we think the only way CD-4 would make even a LITTLE bit of a comeback is if we coupled it with DMM technology and cut it at 33 for 45 playback.
My colleagues and I have been researching this for about the past seven years or so - and we think either with one of the latter-day (1977) 2/3rd speed CD-4 cutterheads Greg Bogantz worked with - or the Ortofon prototype they made exactly six of in Scandanavia in 1979 -
we could have them converted to DMM -
get a VMS-82/84 lathe and in the process become the only commercial mastering house in America (besides Scientology) to even HAVE DMM in the FIRST place even for NORMAL cutting (which could also help raise money for the CD-4 DMM project) - and then
Attract the NON-CD-4 audiophile market as well with cutting at 33 to play back at 45 WITHOUT CD-4 the same way that both covers A) the same guys that would buy Half-Speed-Masters (if they made them) as well as the guys who bought B) the Super-Sonic 45-RPM formats that split a single LP over 4 sides - and then once we did that for awhile - do the same thing WITH the CD-4.
But with DMM we wouldn't HAVE to split it up over two discs, so then it would keep the cost down to a reasonable amount since DMM can give you a side length of up to 35 mins for 33 without MUCH loss of quality - at least for which the 45 RPM speed wouldn't make up in one fashion or the next - which means roughly 23 minutes at 45 - enough time for the vast majority of single-disc LP's.
The reason we think the Ortofon head would be the better choice of the two if we could get the tech drawings and all the final engineering designs - is because the Ortofon half-speed-masters on LACQUER in the 70's were so much clearer sounding than those made on either the Westrex or Neumann - partly because the bass contour effect - while there - is about half that of the Neumann or Westrex heads - at least according to a handful of engineering testimonials we found.
AND the 2/3rds cutting speed that was already proven successful in 1977 before CD-4 died, (in this case pushed up slightly from 66.6666% to 75% speed) eliminates or greatly minimizes the bass contour effect inherent in half-speed mastering. Or so the various whitepapers quote from guys who supposedly had ears enough back then to know what were they talking about.
Check out the MFSL Dutch Half-Speed vs the Mobile Fidelity Half-Speed of
Days of Future Passed to get a good example - or just about any decent title that had double-inventory between MFSL, CBS Half-Speed and Nautilus. Most Mo-Fi's were cut on an Ortofon and most Nautilus and CBS HSM's were cut on a Neumann.
After re-setting the NAB and RIAA curves - if you play back a 15 IPS master on a MUZAK machine (that we already have in an all-tube 350AG) at 11-1/4 IPS - we cut at 33 for 45 playback to avoid having to use more non-standard equipment than we have to and waste money.
The speed percentage (74.0740740... and 75.00) is not that much different than the speed difference between US 45's (45.00) and 78's (78.26) and those made in 50Hz/220V countries which are 45.45 and 77.92. Which if guys thought there was that big of a difference, since presumably they'd all be on audiophile turntables with pitch adjust anyway - we could put a strobe around the edge of the label with the exact speed - and then have the first disc be full of test tones and generic music that we give away.
And then the Seeburg background-music jukebox people we know want to use DMM to re-cut all the Seeburg, Rowe (CustoMusic) and AEI 16-RPM nine-inch discs with the two-inch-hole - and the 7-inch 16-RPM Chrysler Highway Hi-Fi, and the Auto-Com 16 RPM flexidiscs and on and on and on people - all of whom want it pressed onto colored vinyl that matches the original label color - that they all need for their specialized custom players that they keep running 30 years after the format was withdrawn - like the 78 RPM re-issues Len cut for Rhino back in the 90's for ``jukebox use'' even though nobody with a brain actually used `em thereon.
And we also found out that even though the DMM mechanical chatter is around 30KHz - which means even if you COULD cut CD-4 in real-time on DMM - the chatter would wreak havoc with the carrier wave - but again - the law of mathematics supposedly comes to our aid here as well because according to our various math geniuses - the 30KHz chatter would still be at the same 30KHz when mastering at 33 for 45 playback as it would be for 33 for 33 playback.
Meaning your 30KHz mechanical DMM chatter would not only NOW be 45KHz but it would also be DOWN 10 or 20 dB as well compared to 33 for 33 playback - and the 30 KHz CD-4 tone being recorded would now be 22-1/2KHz - supposedly well out of the way of one another.
So there IS a market for it - we just need more than one sponsor - and we need to get all the sponsors all on the same page to
get the DMM lathe in the first place -
get the drawings to the Ortofon head -
pay Len Horowitz or Flo or whoever to re-design it to match or exceed the six prototype heads from 1979 -
do the same for the Quadulator -
pay a couple of the few remaining DMM engineers in the world
to come work with the few remaining CD-4 engineers in the world
to come work with the few remaining half-speed-master guys
and then go ``on the air'' and understand that we'd be using the thousands-of-sides from the CustoMusic etc libraries as training grounds to A) raise money and B) get a good handle on the process, tweaking as we go before we start doing the DMM 33-for-playback-at-45 records WITHOUT the CD-4 - and then progressing to the same thing WITH the CD-4.
So like I said - if anybody can help with sourcing equipment, documentation or sponsorships and is serious about wanting to sponsor some new DMM/CD-4/45-LP technology - drop us a line.
Because if we do it on our own first - as a noncommercial venture - then maybe it - as well as Lou's work - can both become commercial once again.
Oh, and for a turntable, we'd need to resurrenct this old Denon linear tracking prototype they made in Japan in the mid 80's that is not only linear tracking, but it also has a movable center spindle to correct for eccentricities in the disc AND is has some sort of ``eyes'' in the lid so that - instead of playing constant ``catch-up'' like a normal linear tracker (fall behind in the groove and have a servo drive spin a bit to catch it back up) this one had a Groove Mapper in it which would spin the disc a few times after being centered and capture an image of the groove pack and then relay that information to the tonearm servos so that it would follow the pack exactly.
It didn't work in the 80's because computing technology wasn't up to the task - but with today's binocular high resolution image-capture devices - it should be a breeze.
Or if we wanted - in order to get more than 22 minutes on a side - while we're bringing back extinct technologies - we were looking at bringing back the sixteen-inch LP mastered onto a 17-1/4 inch blank.
For which we already have a company in Northern California who says they can make the DMM blanks up to 18 inches across and 200 microns deep if we want.
We also have a source for two Hamilton presses that have a 24 inch throat, and Erika Records says they could get an 18 inch blank into their plating tanks no problem.
So we see where it all goes.