Well I've had this Special Edition for 48hrs. I can tell you there is a definite difference in the sound. I've gotten about 9 hrs. of dedicated listening in. I switched players 6 times. These impressions are all in relation to the standard version.
For multichannel I used Deep Purple-Machine Head SACD, King Crimson-ITCOTKK, Elton John-GYBR DVD-A & SACD, Queen-The Game,Porcupine Tree-FOABP, Pink Floyd- Dark Side AP, Dire Straits-BIA DVD-A & SACD Flaming Lips-Yoshimi and Mana-Suenos Liquidos.
For stereo it was Al DiMeola-Elegant Gypsy Japanese, Blood,Sweat and Tears-MFSL SACD, Boston-SACD.I also tried the Stereo mix on several of the DVD-A's.
I find in multichannel there is a tightening of the imaging and localization of sounds and instruments, thereby increasing the perceived spaces between. Clarity is quite good, at times seems to be bordering on bright in the midrange though. Highs are very clean and clear. The bass is very solid and authoratative.
The sound is different, better in some respects? Maybe, but so far, in no way am I hearing a $400.00 difference. This is also Where they decided to use ESS's bottom of the line, the Sabre Premier Audio DAC (ES9006)
Stereo playback is where this machine is supposed to shine(?). So this is where they chose to use the top of the line DAC quadrupled. The Sabre 32 Ultra from ESS (ES9016) .
(I'm sure to someone, somewhere, it makes perfectly good sense to use this for dedicated stereo in a machine that a large part of it's appeal is the playback of legacy audio formats, which are primarily friggin' MULTICHANNEL!! If you find them please hit them with a stick. I just don't get it.)
The special edition in stereo is alright. That's about it. I've heard several good players on my system and a couple very, very good ones. The BP-83 falls closer to the former than the latter. But a revelation from the standard edition? Honestly no. And once again DEFINITELY NOT worth The $400.00 IMHO
I'm trying to decide if I should keep it or send it back at this point. I had 3 friends over last night. Their observations echoed my own in many ways. One friend after listening, asked if there was possibly a setting wrong. I'm really starting to lean towards it doesn't sound as good as the standard in many ways!
It has dedicated stereo and multi out, right? Playing back a stereo track using the stereo analog direct is good and this is the supposed uber DAC. Well if you switch it over to the 5.1 analog out that should be the lesser DAC, correct? Well 7 out of 7 people preferred the 5.1 DAC doing stereo over the other multichannel DAC quadrupled to stereo. What's up with that? No crap, it just flat out sounds better. To the point that one of my friends asked if it could be broken.
This sucks...I really wanted this to be another example of Oppo quality.
P.S. Also found out that the *upgraded* multichannel DAC was previously used in last years $300.00 Samsung The BD-P2550. You can buy refurbs for $200.00 on Amazon
Here's the article:
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS114736+27-Aug-2008+PRN20080827
And if you want to read more on the DAC's themselves:
http://www.esstech.com/index.php?p=products_DAC
And yes, it is the very top and the bottom DAC's.
I'll keep listening, figure I can keep it at least another week or two. Give it a chance. Can't hurt right. But if you made me decide today, it would be on it's way back.