HiRez Poll Simple Minds - NEW GOLD DREAM [Blu-ray Audio (Dolby Atmos)]

QuadraphonicQuad

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Rate the BDA of Simple Minds - NEW GOLD DREAM

  • 8

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1: Terrible Content, Surround Mix, and Fidelity

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    13

rtbluray

Hi-Res Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
QQ Supporter
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
9,720
Location
Middle TN
Please post your thoughts and comments on this brand new Blu-ray Audio edition of the album "New Gold Dream" from Simple Minds.
This new Blu-ray Audio edition was available exclusively from the SDE online store and contains brand new Dolby Atmos and 5.1 surround mixes from Bob Clearmountain.
This Blu-ray Audio edition also features the original 5.1 surround mix originally released in 2005.

(y) :) (n)

ngd_sde_blu_600.jpg
 
I will have to listen to the whole album twice to give it a rating. But having listened to one minute of each of the first four tracks, I must say that this is a huge disappointment for me.
I had mixed feelings about the 2005 5.1 mix when it first came out because I didn't like the way Ronald Prent had treated this album. Michael MacNeil's keyboards were buried in the mix. But here, it's even worse: Bob Clearmountain has made the keyboards disappear. It's pretty obvious on the chorus of "Someone Somewhere In Summertime". Something is really missing there. It's not 100% gone, but almost.
The Atmos mix has 80% of the audio in the center channel and what happens in the other channels is quite diffuse, even if it's discrete at times. Jim Kerr's vocals are mixed on top of everything else. And even if it's quite pleasing to be able to hear disctinctly each word he sings, it's too detached from the rest.
I was expecting a lot from this release and, again, I will have to dive into it to evaluate the Atmos experience for what it really is. But right now, I feel more than underwhelmed.
 
I will have to listen to the whole album twice to give it a rating. But having listened to one minute of each of the first four tracks, I must say that this is a huge disappointment for me.
I had mixed feelings about the 2005 5.1 mix when it first came out because I didn't like the way Ronald Prent had treated this album. Michael MacNeil's keyboards were buried in the mix. But here, it's even worse: Bob Clearmountain has made the keyboards disappear. It's pretty obvious on the chorus of "Someone Somewhere In Summertime". Something is really missing there. It's not 100% gone, but almost.
The Atmos mix has 80% of the audio in the center channel and what happens in the other channels is quite diffuse, even if it's discrete at times. Jim Kerr's vocals are mixed on top of everything else. And even if it's quite pleasing to be able to hear disctinctly each word he sings, it's too detached from the rest.
I was expecting a lot from this release and, again, I will have to dive into it to evaluate the Atmos experience for what it really is. But right now, I feel more than underwhelmed.

Yep. Both mixes pretty much suck. (I listen to the Atmos on 5.1)

The rears are mostly just reflective, for lack of a better term. Nothing really discreet going on there. The center in the Atmos mix is lead vocal, bass and drums on most tracks. On the 5.1 it's more just vocals. It's not a bad listen, especially when cranked up, but it's not what I'd expect for an album like this.

I'll give it a "7" and that's being generous. Mostly for the content. I'll give a listen and crank it up on my "big" system upstairs maybe tomorrow and see if it sounds any different there.
 
Here is an interesting read:
An online review that compares almost all digital formats available
I agree with the conclusion about the Dolby Atmos listening experience.

It's odd, because everywhere I've been looking, most people seems to enjoy this Atmos mix (SDE community, Simple Minds followers on Facebook, Discogs community). I guess we are a little too demanding here...
 
The rears are mostly just reflective, for lack of a better term. Nothing really discreet going on there.
Hmm. I can't really speak to how faithful this new mix is the original stereo version, but in Atmos I definitely get the sensation of distinct instruments placed all around me. In the first track, the electric rhythm guitar is totally isolated in the left side speaker. "Promised You A Miracle" has discrete keys in the sides and handclaps in the back. "Big Sleep" goes back to keys in front, guitars in sides. The height channels seem to be mostly ambience/delays, but there's a lot of seperation between the ground-level speakers.
 
Here is an interesting read:
An online review that compares almost all digital formats available
I agree with the conclusion about the Dolby Atmos listening experience.

It's odd, because everywhere I've been looking, most people seems to enjoy this Atmos mix (SDE community, Simple Minds followers on Facebook, Discogs community). I guess we are a little too demanding here...
Wow, just plain wow. Disclaimer, I do not have the knowledge to say whether or not the author-Jeff- Magic/Vinyl/Digital is accurate in his experience and findings, but the presentation and delivery is the best I have ever seen, and I have read a lot.
He obviously takes great pride in producing his findings of recorded music.
I have bookmarked his website and want to read some more.
Thank you for showing us, this new to me, website.
 
Hmm. I can't really speak to how faithful this new mix is the original stereo version, but in Atmos I definitely get the sensation of distinct instruments placed all around me. In the first track, the electric rhythm guitar is totally isolated in the left side speaker. "Promised You A Miracle" has discrete keys in the sides and handclaps in the back. "Big Sleep" goes back to keys in front, guitars in sides. The height channels seem to be mostly ambience/delays, but there's a lot of seperation between the ground-level speakers.
i will give it another spin on another system and see if something else is the cause for my not hearing much.
 
I took the time to listen to NGD some more this morning. One full track (Big Sleep), first with the blu-ray and the 2024 Dolby Atmos mix, and then with the 2005 DVD-A and its 5.1 mix.
And I must say that I've moderated my initial judgement. The Atmos mix seems to be a good mix after all.
I don't like when too much use is made of the center channel, but Bob Clearmountain did it well. Every instrument sounds good, clear and balanced. The use of the other channels, although being somewhat reserved, always seems pleasant and natural. Nothing is forced, the mix is quite subtle. And the panning is used in a rather creative way.
In comparison, the 2005 5.1 mix sounds a lot more immersive with an even distribution of the five channels. But each instrument seems to dwell in one dedicated speaker from which it doesn't move, unlike the Atmos mix.
I think it's a matter of taste here.
All in all, the only true downside of the Bob Clearmountain mixes is the curious choice he made to quiet the keyboards in this album.
 
Here is an interesting read:
An online review that compares almost all digital formats available
I agree with the conclusion about the Dolby Atmos listening experience.

It's odd, because everywhere I've been looking, most people seems to enjoy this Atmos mix (SDE community, Simple Minds followers on Facebook, Discogs community). I guess we are a little too demanding here...
Nice analysis. It confirms what I found on the streaming versions of both albums recently released in Atmos. Absolutely too much center channel. Which is pretty much the nemesis of how I like immersive music to sound like. :-(
 
New Gold Dream tracks - talk about panning. Woooooooo! Only slight negative is volume level is a bit low on both albums. I am sold! Full Atmos rig (4 height speakers plus 5,1)
 
The SDE albums are all about 5.1 and atmos to me. My rating is 9 for the old 5.1 mix (worth the price on it's own). It can't be a 10 because of the two tracks that lacks the 5.1 treatment due to inaccessible multitracks at the time. I rate both new mixes as 6. The average is then 7.

Hoping to see more Simple Minds in atmos. Thiniking 'Real Life' would be great if Stephen Lipson get to remix his own production.

My detailed opinions on 'New Gold Dream' can be read here:
https://www.quadraphonicquad.com/fo...-released-february-7th-2025.36791/post-835899
 
9

Pretty much the same as Sparkle in the Rain I guess. I had these albums at the time and I can assure you they didn't sound this good in stereo. The new 5.1 mix is as good as you're gonna get for such a synth-heavy endeavor with that '80s production.
 
System:
Receiver: Marantz SR5014
Player: Sony - UBP-X800M2
Speakers: Definitive Technology Studio Monitor 350 - Matching Fronts, Center, Surrounds
Polk Sub
Episode Signature In-Ceiling

Set-Up: 5.1.2 (Ceiling Mids)

Atmos Mix: 9 (my vote reflects this mix)
New 5.1: 8
Old 5.1: 10

ATMOS Mix
Someone, Somewhere between Ronald Prent and Bob Clearmountain, this could have been the perfect mix—but no one promised me a miracle.
I grew up with this album. It’s always been my go-to for that first spring time drive, windows down, songs thumping. And that old 5.1 DVD-A? It’s been in heavy rotation since 2005. Not the best fidelity—maybe a bit over-compressed and slightly muddy—but packed with energy and punch. Still my favorite Simple Minds’ album.

At first, I struggled with how neutered and narrow the bass and drums sounded stuck in the center speaker in the new Atmos mix. But as I settled in, I started to appreciate its sleeker, more balanced, and discretely immersive nature. It dials everything down a bit, making space for nuances that weren’t as apparent or noticeable before.

@MisterMe mentioned feeling like Bob made the keyboards disappear, but that’s not my experience. They may no longer be the dominant focal point, but the mix feels more balanced overall. The keyboards are slightly dialed back (perhaps occupying more of the rear channels?), while the guitars have been given more presence. After a few tracks, I found myself appreciating the guitar work in ways I hadn’t before.

There seem to be differing opinions, but on my system, the rear and height speakers are more than just reflective — I’m not folding the Atmos mix down to 5.1 so maybe that is the case with the fold down. Or maybe it is a volume issue? I did notice that I had to pump up the volume a little to start really noticing anything but the fronts.

I always felt the old DVD-A mix got better as the album progressed, especially after Promised You a Miracle (noticeably improved here), and weirdly, the Atmos mix follows a similar pattern. On the first few cuts, I wondered why Bob didn’t take greater advantage of the heights—especially for those twinkling keyboard runs—when BAM: late into the title track, the heights suddenly fire off with percussion, vocals, keyboards, and fretwork. The back half of the album uses the heights much more effectively. That said, I started to miss the low end thump. Big Sleep, Hunter and the Hunted, and King Is White and in the Crowd would hit much harder with Mel Gaynor’s signature drumming. Speaking of King Is White…, the studio chatter from the old DVD-A mix has been removed to match the original stereo mix.

While I love the new sleek & polished Atmos version, I’ll always prefer the old 5.1 mix for tracks like Glittering Prize—I love how that low end punches between the vocal pause between the refrains. That is kind of funny because I think their next album went way too far with dialing back the keyboard and brickwalling the drums.

This Atmos mix would have been perfect with just a little more oomph. Still, I love this new Roxy Music – Avalon–like feel. Ultimately, it sits closer to the original stereo mix (which always had fantastic, almost 3D sound imaging)—except, of course, for the lack of bass and drums.

Quick Observations by Song:
Someone: Definitely discrete with the rears having Charlie's guitar clearly in the left and keys & cymbals in the right. Vocal, bass, drum anchored mostly centered throughout the album.

Colours Fly: The keyboard “pinging” bounces between the rears. The rolling keyboard and then guitar moves somewhat from the fronts to sides. Way more pronounced than the old 5.1. First noticeable hint of keys in the heights + some vocal effects.

Promised You a Miracle: Hand claps that I never noticed on the 5.1 or stereo are discreetly in the rears. Chopstick like keyboards are slightly elevated in the heights. Backing vocal tracks in rear heights but it just sounds mumbled.

Big Sleep: The yawning sustained guitar bounces diagonally from rear to front. In the old 5.1 it is locked in the fronts. The guitar picking is much more pronounced. The song’s vocal effects are clear and placed in the heights, while the old 5.1 it sounds more like an immersive whisper (which kind of works better for a song about the big sleep 😊).

Somebody: The track starts in the fronts steadily gaining volume while moving into the rest of speakers. (The old 5.1 has an immersive rise from all speakers.

New Gold Dream: The 5.1 rolls up from the rears and the bass line is featured in the front. The new Atmos mix sacrifices the clarity of the bass line and rises up from the front. The heights really start getting busy near the end of the song with lots of the keyboard panning, percussion runs, vocals, and guitar.

Glittering Prize: The snare is really noticeable in the heights with way less processing than the 5.1 or original stereo mixes. The female backing vocal is really defined and a bit anchored in the left rear & side. The original stereo and 5.1 have it less prominent & more like a choir effect.

Hunter and the Hunted: The keys are focused in the rears and the rhythm in the front. Bob places a front desk bell and some other synth bell sounds into the heights which are again were not that noticeable in prior mixes.

King: The new mix cleans up the more stadium rock feel the original 5.1 mix gave it an open and more hypnotic feel.

Final Thoughts on the Atmos Mix: Bob C masterfully leveraged the album’s heavy reliance on repetitive arpeggios, especially the keyboards and synth pads to create a rich, immersive Atmos mix. The fluid interplay of these arpeggios, combined with the better balance of instrumentation with the melodic counterpoints weaving in and out of the mix really enhances the album’s dynamic depth and atmosphere.

New Dedicated 5.1 Mix
Of the formats on this release, the new 5.1 mix is the weakest. It lacks the heft of the original 5.1 and the distinct detail of the Atmos. This is probably where those keyboard bits get lost.

The 2005 5.1 Mix on Blu-ray
The 2005 5.1 mix included here sounds pretty faithful to my old DVD-A. The low end is spread across the fronts with that slightly oversaturated oomph. Compared to the Atmos mix, the instrumentation feels more static—more discrete than immersive. The bonus cut In Every Heaven (absent in the 2024 mixes) is still included.



Up next for me? Sparkle in Rain. Can Bob do what Wilson couldn’t do in fixing that album’s original overly compressed dynamics, gated drums, muddy low end, and harsh midrange
 
Finally getting around to casting a vote and a brief review. Terrific immersive mix in Atmos, consistently excellent songs, well arranged and produced. I gave this a 10. I never listened to previous versions in surround that much, not sure why. And never heard the 80s versions except what was on the radio - so I don’t have any allegiance to a particular way of mixing/remixing or whether or not certain instruments are emphasized or not. (Parenthetically, hence the parentheses, the Beatles remixes get heavily judged based on instrument emphasis so I totally understand any outrage because a flute disappeared, etc.). New Gold Dream has surprised me by the number of times I have played and enjoyed it. Sparkle in the Rain not so much but I will force myself to listen more before posting an opinion.
 
Back
Top