It’s largely viewed from a broader public health standpoint, that is to say, how many PSA tests would have been done that turned out in the end to be of no consequence and, therefore, unnecessary? I’m not saying that I agree with it, rather, I’m just putting it out there that it’s the new medical standard of care in our healthcare system. In the aggregate, such a standard may save money when averaged across a population of older American males but it doesn’t take into account what the life expectancy of a particular individual might be. I’d suspect that you, for instance, have a life expectancy that is much, much higher than most of us because your Dad lived to be 93. Interestingly, as an African American male, my life expectancy is statistically said to be 73 years. This is despite the facts that (1) I will be 73 in August, and (2) both of my parents lived to age 88. Keep in mind that average African American male life expectancy is lower for a variety of reasons. Things like cigarette smoking, kidney failure, diabetes, hypertension, heart attacks, Covid, opioids and being the victim of physical violence lead to a major clump of deaths occurring between the ages 50 and 60. You put those deaths in the mix and you come up with an overall lower average. I would contend that those early deaths should not factor into calculations of my life expectancy.
Edit:
(1) The recommendations state that routine screening should occur up through age 69. After that, life expectancy is one of the factors to be taken into account. They do not specifically say that “you are going to die anyway so why bother,” but that, obviously, is what they are trying avoid being so blunt about in their wording.
(2) Black males have a higher risk of developing prostate cancer, so it would stand to reason that someone with my family life expectancy should continue to be screened regularly.