Actually a quad release on the Rolling stones label does exist, Bill Wyman Monkey grip:Released through Atlantic, but didn't bear that specific label.
Actually a quad release on the Rolling stones label does exist, Bill Wyman Monkey grip:Released through Atlantic, but didn't bear that specific label.
I find it surprising that Capitol Records, despite them being a part of EMI in those days, didn't get behind quad. They gave us some sampler records, and fully supported classical quad through their Angel and Seraphim subsidiaries, but they pretty much avoided popular music in quad LP. Q8 had some support for pop. Even DSOTM, from Pink Floyd, got a Q8 release on American shores, but no SQ LP release. McCartney and Wings; Deep Purple; Where were the Capitol SQ's?Probably because WEA had no financial incentive behind QUAD. After all, Columbia owned the SQ encode system and RCA at the time promulgated their CD~4 Discrete system. WEA probably had to pay royalties to RCA for licensing CD~4.
And let's not forget, the artists themselves who heard those various QUAD LPs in actual playback were probably not at all impressed with the results and history would prove them correct. Only the QR [QUAD OPEN REEL] system adequately conveyed 4 channel QUAD at the time and the expense of producing those open reel tapes prohibited a lot of releases in that format....as it utilized double the tape traveling @ 7 1/2 ips.
As to ALL the A+ list bands you mentioned who didn't have QUAD releases in the 70's, they were ALL British Bands and I don't know if QUAD was popular in Europe at the time. Perhaps some of our knowledgeable European QQ posters could enlighten us?
It has a very gratuitous playful mix of the keyboard! Often panning around the room with abandon. The other instruments have a few cursory moments of quad play. I think it kind of follows the live mix approach with that. The complaint is the rest of the instruments and especially the drums not given extended treatment.BTW, had no idea that “Welcome Back…” was on quad 8. The shows that were recorded for that album were my first rock concert. How was it mixed? Was it crowd noises in the rear speakers, or did the synth track while around the room?
IIRC, Mitch Miller almost single-handedly destroyed Columbia Records because he didn’t like rock and roll. “Do you really call that snot music?” And, of course, they were the prime mover behind SQ, so I can’t say I’m exactly surprised that there was so little music that appealed to kids in the day.But think about it. If the labels had pushed A+ list artists like Led Zeppelin, The Stones, The Fab Four during the QUAD era it might've catapulted the format to more mainstream recognition. Who wouldn't want to hear their favorite artists in discrete four channel QUAD? But not even releasing them in Q4 Open Reel which did offer the BEST separation at the time [and dolby b NR] was an egregious omission!
Finally in 2024 we do have the Beatles and the Stones in 5.1/ATMOS but still no LED ZEP.
Wake up Page and Plant: you ain't gonna live FOREVER!
Oh, and the big complaint is literally every copy made was flawed product from one of the trashier duplication houses with no content above 8kHz!
IIRC, Mitch Miller almost single-handedly destroyed Columbia Records because he didn’t like rock and roll. “Do you really call that snot music?” And, of course, they were the prime mover behind SQ, so I can’t say I’m exactly surprised that there was so little music that appealed to kids in the day.
I find it surprising that Capitol Records, despite them being a part of EMI in those days, didn't get behind quad. They gave us some sampler records, and fully supported classical quad through their Angel and Seraphim subsidiaries, but they pretty much avoided popular music in quad LP. Q8 had some support for pop. Even DSOTM, from Pink Floyd, got a Q8 release on American shores, but no SQ LP release. McCartney and Wings; Deep Purple; Where were the Capitol SQ's?
Record execs favored anything which would make them money.I've never met any record execs from the 70s, so I have no idea what their own favored titles may have been.
Were younger people complaining about what was or wasn't released in quad at the time? When I was a teen in the 70s, I didn't know a single person with a quad system.
current music being mixed to Atmos is primarily done with those listening on earbuds in mind. Which is likely to skew much younger than did those with quad systems back in the 70s.
Also, today when new music is being mixed in Atmos, I presume it is usually being done at the same time they are mixing to stereo. It's probably cheaper to create an Atmos mix of the, say, new Olivia Rodrigo album while they are also doing the stereo than it is to drag out old tapes of a classic title and hire someone to specifically create an Atmos mix of that.
I have no data to back this up, but I do believe that then and now they were/are targeting those with the playback systems.
But it really does make one curious as to what happened behind the scenes. Was the Walter Murphy title mixed to Quad back in '76 when it was fresh or was in mixed in 1979?
I honestly can't believe RCA would do that only to print a small run of 100 tapes. It had to come to them already mixed. (that's my guess, anyway!) The mix also doesn't jive with anything RCA was doing at the time as there's a lot of "side" information going on.
I don't have the original "Private Stock Records" pressing so I'm no help there.
I would love to hear from them again, when they disappear like that you wonder if they are still with us. I hope that both are well.This is all speculation, but it kind of makes sense. Larry Clifton or Nick Perugini might know more, but they rarely stop in here anymore - and haven't for years
Thing is, Canada and the US were separate divisions of EMI, and didn't affect each other. In fact, Columbia, in the US, did release John Keating's "Space Experience" album in the US. The other two albums, "John Keating Incorporated", and "Mandingo III", found their ways to us as imports. The Capitol samplers we did get, at least gave a glimpse of what they could have offered us.My Mother had the album "Sing Along with Mitch", I still have it somewhere. It is one of those that I never ever liked.
By the time of SQ there was a lot of rock on Columbia Records. Many of the biggest names in fact. The best selection in the Quad era came from CBS (Columbia/Epic)!
I don't really fault Capitol too much, they just took a bit slower approach, largely missing the bus. Sadly it was a bus that ended up going nowhere. There were a lot of rock Q8's released on Capitol. Why so reluctant to release popular titles in SQ might just have been a bad management decision. They wanted to see how quad and the format war would shape up, then an impatient industry destroyed the very idea before it was given a half a chance!
The more popular SQ albums that did get released (EMI Canada) like Mandingo III, John Keating Incorporated Hits In HiFi and Space Experience were fantastic!
Actually a quad release on the Rolling stones label does exist, Bill Wyman Monkey grip:
London titles were Only up to "Let It Bleed".What albums, by the Rolling Stones, were released on Atlantic? Seems to me they were on London.
I find it surprising that Capitol Records, despite them being a part of EMI in those days, didn't get behind quad. They gave us some sampler records, and fully supported classical quad through their Angel and Seraphim subsidiaries, but they pretty much avoided popular music in quad LP. Q8 had some support for pop. Even DSOTM, from Pink Floyd, got a Q8 release on American shores, but no SQ LP release. McCartney and Wings; Deep Purple; Where were the Capitol SQ's?
Capitol had signed for QS. Then the bottom fell out.I find it surprising that Capitol Records, despite them being a part of EMI in those days, didn't get behind quad. They gave us some sampler records, and fully supported classical quad through their Angel and Seraphim subsidiaries, but they pretty much avoided popular music in quad LP. Q8 had some support for pop. Even DSOTM, from Pink Floyd, got a Q8 release on American shores, but no SQ LP release. McCartney and Wings; Deep Purple; Where were the Capitol SQ's?
You are entitled to your opinion and you have stated that same one many times over even though it is totally absurd!When they started offering discrete 4-channel reel machines, sales exceeded expectations.
When companies started making quad equipment, sales were far below expectations - except the reel machines.
The bottom fell out of quad when they discovered the reel machines were going into home recording studios, not quad systems.
Why do you say it is absurd? They totally misread the market. When they found out why, they stopped making quad equipment and recordings.You are entitled to your opinion and you have stated that same one many times over even though it is totally absurd!
Not at all! Those early machines were only good for quad and recording two or four channels simultaneously. Only latter models added provision for independent track recording making them useful in a home studio. The second use did not preclude the first use in any way. Those machines were available for a longer time than other quad equipment, in part because of that secondary use. Availability of those machines had nothing to do with the abandonment of quad. That assertion is absurd!!! I was still purchasing discrete quad reels into the eighties.Why do you say it is absurd? They totally misread the market. When they found out why, they stopped making quad equipment and recordings.
MAN, that's a hen's tooth, your Q8 of "Fifth of Beethoven"! Triple-obscure, are you even able to play it? I suspect that home tech exists to capture vintage quad mixes like these fragile quad 8 tracks as a digital file, but it's all way over my head. It's not a totally academic question for me, after decades of searching I was able to snag a GRT Q8 of Focus "Moving Waves" but I'm scared to try & play it on my very aged & untested Panasonic Q8 stand-alone home deck. This was the ONLY quad release by Focus, along with "Live at the Rainbow," also on GRT Q8, which I DON'T have, but it isn't the high-value-target for me that "Moving Waves" was. I'm stalled trying to figure out my best move to play & preserve this ultra-rare "fossil mix" of a stratospheric personal favorite.It was never available commercially. It was initially available on Private Stock Records, which had it's tape duplication done by GRT. What's curious is that
even in '76, GRT was still doing Quad duplication! Several of the Arista Q8's are dated 1976. So, why this never appeared on a blue GRT cart in '76 is anybody's guess.
It was offered through the Ford Quad program in 1979! Ed Bishop years back figured it must've been a case where, when Mr. Murphy changed over to RCA records in 1979, it must've just been a case of a Quad Master transferring ownership and RCA figured.... what the hell???
View attachment 67356
101% agree on the "dull" side...Actually I really didn't want to mention this very dull Rolling Stones' member's lone quad title.
Enter your email address to join: