I was really surprised that we got the two EW&Fs as a two-fer. Much bigger sellers than the Garfunkel titles in their day with songs still on the radio much more often now. And the band is still a large draw in concert.But then how much is TOO MUCH?
I think Mr. Dutton has a good grip on his business practices as in the case of the two Art Garfunkel discs which were single discs and sold as well, if NOT better, than his QUAD two~fer SACDs at the same price point of £11.99.
D~V had a recent sale where a RBCD two~fer sold for as little as £.99. And we're talking quality music remastered with the same care he affords his QUAD remasters ... from the original analogue tapes.
I was really surprised that we got the two EW&Fs as a two-fer. Much bigger sellers than the Garfunkel titles in their day with songs still on the radio much more often now. And the band is still a large draw in concert.
Were they really able to get those two for that much cheaper? Or was there some other reason?
whatever it is, I’m not complaining!
Indeed!Good point, Whiz. Perhaps D~V has become such a great customer of SONY that they made him an offer he coudn't refuse. Agreed, the EW&F QUADS certainly outsold the Garfunkels which further accentuates D~V's ART of the Deal!
Got a chance to preview the O’Jays disc before my copy arrives - I think “blown away” doesn’t even begin to cover it.
I'm so thrilled D-V got this one out as a) I love the music and b) there never were discrete Q8s of these albums, only SQ matrix-encoded LPs.
I had a bit of fun comparing my old conversions (the LPs decoded with a Fosgate Tate II decoder) with the new SACD. I'm of the opinion that SQ can sound decent with a good decoder and good turntable/cartridge, but this is one of those cases where the differences between the two are striking.
Take for instance, the opening track of Survival - “Give The People What They Want”. It opens with the hi-hat panning right-to-left, just like the stereo mix. On the SQ decode, it sounds almost as if the pan starts in right front, then passes through the rears ending in front left. This new SACD reveals that the pan is restricted to the front channels, and the rears are silent!
"Give The People What They Want" (Decoded SQ):
View attachment 45312
"Give The People What They Want" (Discrete SACD):
View attachment 45311
Another moment that took me by surprise is the intro to one of my favorite tracks on the Family Reunion LP- “Livin’ For The Weekend”. The song starts with bass followed by the entrance of a very dramatic piano riff. On the SQ decode, the piano sounds almost as if it’s coming from almost every direction at once, with a reverberant trail in the rear channels. The SACD reveals that the piano riff and its reverb are fully isolated in the front channels; all that’s present in the rears is a bit of tambourine in the right rear channel.
“Livin’ For The Weekend” (Decoded SQ):
View attachment 45315
“Livin’ For The Weekend” (Discrete SACD):
View attachment 45316
Perhaps the most notable difference between the two is that the backing vocals are now firmly rooted in the rear channels. Shut them off, and the chorus vocals in tracks such as “You And Me” and “Give The People What They Want” will completely disappear.
Why do these two quad mixes fare so poorly (IMO) in SQ LP form? My best guess would be because they are mixed in a very “modern” surround style - rhythm section in stereo across the fronts, with the rears deployed for supporting elements such as backing vocals, rhythm guitar, horns, and strings.
Based on my own experiences working with old quad gear, it seems that the hardware SQ decoders of the ‘70s were much more accurate at placing hard-panned mono elements in their intended locations within the 4-channel space than they were with stereo images. I would guess that the folks at CBS understood this, as many of their quad mixes have extreme separation between the four speakers with no stereo elements present - presumably to cover the flaws of the system.
Bottom line - I’m thrilled the engineers at PIR went for the modern approach, even if we had to wait almost 50 years to hear it properly. Don't hesitate to pick this one up!
Got a chance to preview the O’Jays disc before my copy arrives - I think “blown away” doesn’t even begin to cover it.
I'm so thrilled D-V got this one out as a) I love the music and b) there never were discrete Q8s of these albums, only SQ matrix-encoded LPs.
I had a bit of fun comparing my old conversions (the LPs decoded with a Fosgate Tate II decoder) with the new SACD. I'm of the opinion that SQ can sound decent with a good decoder and good turntable/cartridge, but this is one of those cases where the differences between the two are striking.
Take for instance, the opening track of Survival - “Give The People What They Want”. It opens with the hi-hat panning right-to-left, just like the stereo mix. On the SQ decode, it sounds almost as if the pan starts in right front, then passes through the rears ending in front left. This new SACD reveals that the pan is restricted to the front channels, and the rears are silent!
"Give The People What They Want" (Decoded SQ):
View attachment 45312
"Give The People What They Want" (Discrete SACD):
View attachment 45311
Another moment that took me by surprise is the intro to one of my favorite tracks on the Family Reunion LP- “Livin’ For The Weekend”. The song starts with bass followed by the entrance of a very dramatic piano riff. On the SQ decode, the piano sounds almost as if it’s coming from almost every direction at once, with a reverberant trail in the rear channels. The SACD reveals that the piano riff and its reverb are fully isolated in the front channels; all that’s present in the rears is a bit of tambourine in the right rear channel.
“Livin’ For The Weekend” (Decoded SQ):
View attachment 45315
“Livin’ For The Weekend” (Discrete SACD):
View attachment 45316
Perhaps the most notable difference between the two is that the backing vocals are now firmly rooted in the rear channels. Shut them off, and the chorus vocals in tracks such as “You And Me” and “Give The People What They Want” will completely disappear.
Why do these two quad mixes fare so poorly (IMO) in SQ LP form? My best guess would be because they are mixed in a very “modern” surround style - rhythm section in stereo across the fronts, with the rears deployed for supporting elements such as backing vocals, rhythm guitar, horns, and strings.
Based on my own experiences working with old quad gear, it seems that the hardware SQ decoders of the ‘70s were much more accurate at placing hard-panned mono elements in their intended locations within the 4-channel space than they were with stereo images. I would guess that the folks at CBS understood this, as many of their quad mixes have extreme separation between the four speakers with no stereo elements present - presumably to cover the flaws of the system.
Bottom line - I’m thrilled the engineers at PIR went for the modern approach, even if we had to wait almost 50 years to hear it properly. Don't hesitate to pick this one up!
I finally got around to sampling these yesterday and decided to limit myself to 2. And those were the 2 I liked best - EWF (man, that funky bass!) and the O’Jays.I'm in for EW&F. Not sure about any of the other newest ones. Maybe the O'Jays?
brilliant info! thanks!
so interesting that opening track off Survival is mixed closer to the Stereo than it decoded through the Surround Master too!
i think its tracks like "I Love Music" that might benefit most from the upgrade to SACD, that one was at the end of a very full side of SQ vinyl pressed incredibly close to the label so it always sounded kinda muddy and cludgey.. can't wait to hear these puppies! just wish mah fookin' parsehole would turn up! a weeks the longest a bitchin' batch has taken to arrive chez moi, i coulda power-minced it quicker the 10-15 miles or whatever it is to the Watford Wizbit! maybe posties nicked me batch and is livin' for the weekend to my discs as we speak the cheeky Royal Male..!!
You’re in for a treat old chap! Hopefully they’ll come through tomorrow?! They sound supersonic! Absolute belters, the best batch I’ve ever heard!
This is how I reacted when the postie delivered mine!
I am looking forward to receiving my copies of all of these, but especially Helen Reddy. I hope they release her other Quad albums too, because I would love to hear Helen 'Keep on singing' in Quad.yeay! they're here! (..-and on a Sunday?!?? how's that for service!!) 🛩
i'm so happy i could.. uh oh.. too late!
yeay! they're here! (..-and on a Sunday?!?? how's that for service!!) 🛩
i'm so happy i could.. uh oh.. too late!
Still waiting for my December order to arrive...grrr..ordered it on Dec 20 it's been one month exactly..saw the post(woman) today, she said there a huge backlog of stuff in Athens(Greece) from Christmas!! I live on the island of Crete, so I'm not holding my breath...And at this rate/pace , not sure when the Funk/Soul batch will arrive...second grrr...Enough venting...all of you that have received these, especially the Funk/Soul batch, please share your impressions.
Hmm, the shipping of this group appears to be on track in the US. My order of 3 is in LA as we speak. Should be here in a few days.
Hopefully your order will show up soon so the listening can begin!
Enter your email address to join: