DTS & DD are unacceptable, but DTS 96/24 is just fine. The Tulls sound absolutely wonderful. I will accept that compromise every day.
DTS & DD are unacceptable, but DTS 96/24 is just fine. The Tulls sound absolutely wonderful. I will accept that compromise every day.
The DTS IS 26/94.To Each his own. I played the TULL last night [This Was] in DTS 4.1 and 96/24 Lossless Stereo. They both sound wonderful but the lossless stereo was still better, IMO. I only wish the DTS was 96/24 ..........it's NOT! It's still a treat to have a genuine Steve Wilson 4.1 remix....makes up for a lack of imagination with a lot of recent so~called 5.1 REMIXES.
Have a Happy Thanksgiving, Larry.
The DTS IS 24/96.
On another matter
I don't know how many of you are American Football fans. I've been watching since 1982, when it was first shown here in the UK.
But I've just seen the highlights of one of the most high scoring, exciting and full on games ever.
Between the Chiefs and the Rams.
Fantastic
Sorry for going off topic ..just had to express myself on a truly remarkable game.
I'll stop now.
There is not room for lossless PCM 5.1 surround on a DVD, only space for stereo lossless 96/24 PCM. Yeah, of course lossless is better than lossy, but my point was that if you have to go DVD, DTS 96/24 is as good as it gets, and is an acceptable compromise. I have both Aqualungs, and the difference is not that great. Both are wonderful.
OK, then name just one that has one. You can't.Larry, DVDs can go some seven layers and there's plenty of room for a lossless LPCM 5.1 remix but it's a moot point because that's what they gave us and it is better than nothing.
You're confusing layers (physical) and audio tracks (digital). A DVD-V can contain up to eight different audio tracks to accompany one video track, but lossless surround sound is not an acceptable audio track option in the DVD-V spec. So, while an audio DVD-V with simple still image video tracks/menus might physically contain enough space to house a lossless surround sound track, no DVD-V player would be able to read or play it back properly.Larry, DVDs can go some seven layers and there's plenty of room for a lossless LPCM 5.1 remix but it's a moot point because that's what they gave us and it is better than nothing.
Mine turned up today though I haven't had a chance to listen to it. Its a nice package, and glancing through the book going by the images of the Tape Boxes it seems that it was recorded at 30i.p.s, so the original analogue recording should have been top notch, though sadly it looks like no 5.1 LPCM
This is a band I saw live in the mid-70s quite a few times, always excellent.
I saw The Tubes only once, they played my University, a great gig, I can't remember if it was when I was still a student or after I'd finished and was still living there - too many years ago!30 ips 'downconverted' to LOSSY DTS 5.1 > Unconscionable!
I also saw them live [only once] with the TUBES and both bands were excellent!
Enter your email address to join: