markshan
1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
Absolutely nothing wrong with the SACD
Well, you'll have to take that up with whoever mastered the Blu.
Absolutely nothing wrong with the SACD
Well, you'll have to take that up with whoever mastered the Blu.
I don't know that I would call two channels being out of phase "splitting hairs", but if you can't hear it then I guess it's no loss to you. I knew something was different before I knew what the difference was. I fell in love with the DVD-A but then to my surprise found the Blu to be an improvement. YMMV. Besides, you are the one who said there had been "no definitive answer" when DuncanS clearly gave a definitive answer.Funny. Splitting hairs just isn't my thing.
I don't know that I would call two channels being out of phase "splitting hairs", but if you can't hear it then I guess it's no loss to you. I knew something was different before I knew what the difference was. I fell in love with the DVD-A but then to my surprise found the Blu to be an improvement. YMMV. Besides, you are the one who said there had been "no definitive answer" when DuncanS clearly gave a definitive answer.
Really? Did you read even one single thing that I wrote?I wish all releases sounded as good as the out of phase SACD. Are you commenting on something you have never listened too?
Really? Did you read even one single thing that I wrote?
Well you said that you have the Bluray and DVDA. Does the DVDA have the same inverted phase channels as the SACD?
Both the SACD and DVDA sound quality were getting high praise and 10 votes well before the bluray ever came out. It wasn't until the bluray was released that someone posted about the inverted phase, correct. That doesn't suddenly make the sound quality poor on the SACD.
Your perspective is in hindsight. Mine is from owning the SACD well over a decade. I still wish every release sounded as "poor" as this SACD.
You are putting words in my mouth. I never said it was "poor", in fact I said I fell in love with the DVD-A and only later found the Blu to be even better. I also said that I wouldn't buy it to replace another version but if you don't own one there is good reason to go with the Blu. Why are you acting like a jilted lover? Are you the guy who improperly mastered the early versions?
My poor comment was not attributed to you so relax.
Who was it directed to? Who on this thread said anything about the mix being "poor". I strongly suspect the low votes have to do with the music, not the fidelity. I will "relax" when you quit putting words in my mouth.
Can anyone definitively clarify which versions/ channels of “Sea Change” have a “phase inversion” issue and how one would correct it? (This is a real question )
I have read that the front left and right channels on the DVD-A and SACD are inverted and that the Blu corrected it. I didn't even know what was better about the Blu the first time I heard it, I just knew it was better.Can anyone definitively clarify which versions/ channels of “Sea Change” have a “phase inversion” issue and how one would correct it? (This is a real question )
I have read that the front left and right channels on the DVD-A and SACD are inverted and that the Blu corrected it. I didn't even know what was better about the Blu the first time I heard it, I just knew it was better.
I was addressing skherbeck.Best of Doors sounds better on Bluray than the excellent SACD quad mix. No out of phase channels that I know of. Still splitting hairs imo however.
I was addressing skherbeck.
Can anyone definitively clarify which versions/ channels of “Sea Change” have a “phase inversion” issue and how one would correct it? (This is a real question )