neil wilkes said:
It is definitely possible I have made a mistake with regards to Stage.
It definitely says in the "David Live" liner notes the stereo is "derived from the surround", even though it is a separate asset on the disc - twice, apparently.
Dunno about Live. There are definitely credits for the stereo version on Stage in the liner notes, and I don't recall mention of derivation (which doens't mean it's not there). But I never owned this album before, so I have no idea if its a remix/downmix, or a transfer of the original two-track masters.
I'd be miffed about the High Rez not working.
It's definitely better than the DTS.
<shrug> If the levels have been altered, it's hard to compare. If not, I doubt I'd hear a difference unless they did a terrible job of the encoding. As always, it's technically hard to say for sure why stuff sounds the way it does, though that doesn't stop people from doing so.
To be honest, and this is probably sacrilege here, I surprisingly often end up playing and preferring the two-track versions of many surround discs, through DPL II, because the new dedicated surround mixes are too different from the originals for my taste....once the novelty factor wear off.
I had a yamaha DVD S1500 - apparently (according to the retailer) it will not play Sci-Fi discs - perhaps it won't play Bowie titles either??
Not sure what is meant by 'Sci Fi' discs -- is that a brand? Because certainly I can play sci-fi movies with no problem. ;>
Right after the failure of 'Stage' to emit surround , jsut for peace of mind I checked the player with my UK version of 'Medulla', and it worked fine, as did the old 'Night at the Opera' DVD -A , and "Pet Sounds' (the latter two are known to give some players fits). So I'm not sure what's up with Stage..some obscure authoring issue perhaps.