The store or the box? LOL
That was sooooooooooooooooo close to being awesome...if he wouldn't have included "store" in his post...it would have been a home run...as it stands...it's still a double...mostly for the effort
The store or the box? LOL
They could be waiting until the Chicago hits a certain mark in sales before bringing the next one out.
I'm really glad the Aretha sold out and they were not forced to blow them out as cutouts at the "Family Dollar" stores.
This stuff can sell slow so I can easily see them going xtra slow as a normal precaution.
It's all good I think.
I thought the Chicago set already sold out its initial pressing
Which brings up the questions of how many did they press and sell? And is that target a viable goal for any future quad release?
I would think the Doobies set (which would be smaller and presumably less expensive) would easily sell as many copies.
It did sell out its initial pressing - and another pressing was approved.I thought the Chicago set already sold out its initial pressing?
Which brings up the questions of how many did they press and sell? And is that target a viable goal for any future quad release?
I would think the Doobies set (which would be smaller and presumably less expensive) would easily sell as many copies.
What condition was it in $$? One sealed copy just sold on eBay for around $85Just saw this at a local record shop, made me think of this thread. Unfortunately I already have my own copy...
View attachment 38166
What condition was it in $$? One sealed copy just sold on eBay for around $85
Some guy over at SHF bought hundreds of them - for investment!
You might be able to find the thread over there, but that was probably him. Not sure it will work out too well for him though. Most folks interested in the set bought them first hand.
I remember that thread! Apparently he was convinced there would not be a second pressing and he would be able to charge premium prices for the let. Sadly, that doesn't seem to have worked out for him.
Well, things like this are always a crap shoot. On the surface it might have been worthwhile, the issue was the initial purchase price was high. If, for sake of example, someone bought 100 copies of "Spectrum" from AF, the investment cost would have been far less, but you would never guess that title would end up being highly sought after. If you bought 100 copies of the AF ES Christmas SACD, you'd be declared, well, a moron!
I never have an issue with someone "hoarding", as it's their risk - and reward. They also do a service twice - they keep the sales high for the initial product, and they provide the item to others when it's no longer available - and if it's at a premium, well, so be it. I've bought stuff at high premiums before and that's the way of the world. Supply and demand. AF did it themselves at the end!
As for the guy at SHF - well, I am sure he'll get his money back at some point.
I also would hope they don't tone the bass down. I like lots of gooey bass without the boom, and they fit that description.
Now if only they were being completely remixed so that someone could finally do something about that thin-as-a-rimshot sounding snare drum that Templeman and Co always seemed to be so fond of...
Sorry, no remix.
Yeah I know. I was just making my comment about my one long-held gripe about DB albums: Never liked the snare sound! (Didn’t much like it on the early VH albums either. So I always figured it was a Templeman/Landee thing)
Stereo or quad mixes, or both? Bass over powering it?
This is a poll thread so we try to restrict the comments to the actual title...but it would be nice if you could come Here and let the members say hello
Enter your email address to join: