There’s nothing like a dame.She'd probably give Sir Laurence Olivier a run for the money ......
There’s nothing like a dame.She'd probably give Sir Laurence Olivier a run for the money ......
Coming February 21st from CRITERION and director Richard Linklater the Native UHD4K restoration of DAZED AND CONFUSED
https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Dazed-and-Confused-4K-Blu-ray/327468/#Review
I would LOVE QQ Forum feedback on THE BANSHEES OF INISHERIN! I had DVRed it from HBO in 1080 resolution with a DD 5.1 soundtrack and watched it intently last night and frankly, expecting a 'comedy' it was anything BUT! Of course the acting, cinematography and Carter Burwell's immersive score were without fault but the thick Irish accents and slang throughout necessitated engaging the cc subtitles. Taking place during the Irish Civil War of 1923 on a remote and ficticious Island off the coast of Ireland, I found it ultimately depressing and when Colin Farrell's character [spoiler alert] Such despair, isolation and ennui all pointed to a civil war within the inhabitants of that remote fictional island of Inisherin! And if that was the point, IMO, it succeeded brilliantly!
'Top Gun - Maverick' will easily tip this movie out of top place.Who am I to quibble with the Academy Awards nominations and all the Best of 2022 critics lists?
View attachment 87852
A cranky old fart who had the same reaction to this film.
I would never have sat my tender-hearted animal-loving wife down with the cat on her lap to watch this "dark comedy" had I any inkling of the content.
We even took the precaution of playing the trailer before agreeing to watch it.
Can't be too careful these days, but we feel like we were played for suckers by the trailer and the promotional hype that gave us no inkling ofgraphic depiction of a psychotic episode leading to multiple incidents of savage self-amputation leading to the death of a beloved comfort animal
We've enjoyed many films with these actors.
Ditto for "dark" art-house & foreign cinema with plot twists & ambiguous unresolved endings.
This is no In Bruges.
This was a bridge to far for us.
We would never recommend it to anyone.
It should have come with a trigger warning disclaimer IMHO as if it were Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
YMMV.
In closing, I humbly suggest the quoted post above could have done with a proper spoiler alert.
Not difficult on this forum.
View attachment 87849
View attachment 87848
View attachment 87850
View attachment 87851
I haven't seen this yet and don't know what the spoiler(s) be (so no one spoil it for me please!) but your post has just shoved it up my list a few notches - thank you!Who am I to quibble with the Academy Awards nominations and all the Best of 2022 critics lists?
View attachment 87852
A cranky old fart who had the same reaction to this film.
I would never have sat my tender-hearted animal-loving wife down with the cat on her lap to watch this "dark comedy" had I any inkling of the content.
We even took the precaution of playing the trailer before agreeing to watch it.
Can't be too careful these days, but we feel like we were played for suckers by the trailer and the promotional hype that gave us no inkling ofgraphic depiction of a psychotic episode leading to multiple incidents of savage self-amputation resulting in the death of a beloved comfort animal
We've enjoyed many films with these actors.
Ditto for "dark" art-house & foreign cinema with plot twists & ambiguous unresolved endings.
This is no In Bruges.
This was a bridge to far for us.
We would never recommend it to anyone.
It should have come with a trigger warning disclaimer IMHO as if it were Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
YMMV.
In closing, I humbly suggest the quoted post above could have done with a proper spoiler alert.
Not difficult on this forum.
View attachment 87849
View attachment 87848
View attachment 87850
View attachment 87851
Thank you for the heads up. Won't be watching that one. I'd rather waste my time watching Human Centipede again.Who am I to quibble with the Academy Awards nominations and all the Best of 2022 critics lists?
View attachment 87852
A cranky old fart who had the same reaction to this film.
I would never have sat my tender-hearted animal-loving wife down with the cat on her lap to watch this "dark comedy" had I any inkling of the content.
We even took the precaution of playing the trailer before agreeing to watch it.
Can't be too careful these days, but we feel like we were played for suckers by the trailer and the promotional hype that gave us no inkling ofgraphic depiction of a psychotic episode leading to multiple incidents of savage self-amputation resulting in the death of a beloved comfort animal
We've enjoyed many films with these actors.
Ditto for "dark" art-house & foreign cinema with plot twists & ambiguous unresolved endings.
This is no In Bruges.
This was a bridge too far for us.
We would never recommend it to anyone.
It should have come with a trigger warning disclaimer IMHO as if it were Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
YMMV.
In closing, I humbly suggest the quoted post above could have done with a proper spoiler alert.
Not difficult on this forum.
View attachment 87849
View attachment 87848
View attachment 87850
View attachment 87851
Most films I only care to see once. Leaving Los Vegas being a case in point.Thank you for the heads up. Won't be watching that one. I'd rather waste my time watching Human Centipede again.
Before I read your post I had never heard of Hornaday. Now she’s one of my favorite reviewers. She’s certainly fun to read.Most films I only care to see once. Leaving Los Vegas being a case in point.
That one I knew exactly what I was signing up for.
This review assures me I can skip The Whale:
“In the 1995 film ‘Leaving Las Vegas,’ Nicolas Cage played a man determined to drink himself to death.
Here, [Brendan Fraser as] Charlie is on the same course, except that he’s drowning his existential sorrows in buckets of fried chicken, candy bars, pizza and whipped cream.
The eating scenes in ‘The Whale’ are staged with horrified detail, the sound design tuned to accentuate every gloppy slurp.
[Director Darren] Aronofsky and [screenwriter Samuel D.] Hunter leave little to the imagination, emphasizing at every graphic turn that, for Charlie, food isn’t the stuff of life-giving nourishment, but a vector for compulsion and self-annihilation.” (In theaters)— Ann Hornaday
I found Elvis very uneven, too long, difficult to sit through in a theater, will never watch it again.
Even though I applaud the effort & concede it was a fresh take on a tired worn-out story we all lived through.
The same reviewer above echoes my reaction to it:
"...a dizzying, almost hallucinatory experience —
akin to being thrown into a washing machine and mercilessly churned for 2½ hours.
That isn’t to say that ‘Elvis’ doesn’t provide moments of insight, or even genuine inspiration;
it’s just that they occur fitfully, when the viewer is briefly pasted up against the window before being plunged into the barrel of [writer-director Baz] Luhrmann’s lurid sensibility once again.” (HBO Max) — Ann Hornaday
My favorite one to watch /I think I may have watched it about 50 times- is The Fifth Element, I find something new every time I see it...There are several movies I like to watch multiple times. Yeah, I know how 2001 ends, I know how “Dr. Zhivago” ends, I know how “Hugo” ends, but tney are either spectacular to watch ot they reveal SOMETHING ELSE each time I see them. I’ve bought a few movies that didn’t appeal to me the first time I saw them, and perhaps I’ll cull them out if and when space becomes an issue, but having a movie collection, like having a music collection, is something I enjoy.
I can certainly understand those who don’t find the same joy that I do. Maybe they like looking at the same paintings or riding the same horse or cooking the same casserole. Lots of people like lots of different things.
For me, that's what makes the best movies; rewatchability. Said another way, my favourite flicks are the ones I can watch again and again, and still enjoy. After all, that's what it's primarily about; entertainment.There are several movies I like to watch multiple times. Yeah, I know how 2001 ends, I know how “Dr. Zhivago” ends, I know how “Hugo” ends, but tney are either spectacular to watch ot they reveal SOMETHING ELSE each time I see them. I’ve bought a few movies that didn’t appeal to me the first time I saw them, and perhaps I’ll cull them out if and when space becomes an issue, but having a movie collection, like having a music collection, is something I enjoy.
I can certainly understand those who don’t find the same joy that I do. Maybe they like looking at the same paintings or riding the same horse or cooking the same casserole. Lots of people like lots of different things.
Not anymore they're not.EDIT: Do a search on Amazon: Criterion 4K – all titles appear to be $14!
I just received a PRICE DROP email: Criterion Collection 4K For All Mankind for only $14! That's -72%!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09QS51T5B?th=1&psc=1
Here's some reviews:
https://ultrahd.highdefdigest.com/1...tic score,a thrilling and inspirational ride.https://thedigitalbits.com/item/for-all-mankind-criterion-4k-uhd-2022https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/For-All-Mankind-4K-Blu-ray/309418/#Reviewhttps://www.slantmagazine.com/dvd/4...-for-all-mankind-on-the-criterion-collection/
EDIT: Do a search on Amazon: Criterion 4K – all titles appear to be $14!
If you recall, the FIRST pressings of Madman had a defective BD~A disc and replacements were offered ...... I was cautious ordering this title because who knows if that $14 deal includes the 'corrected' version!That price of $14 is interesting, very interesting. I posted a similar deal alert on the EJ "Madman Across The Water" deluxe edition (regular price mid-$60s) at about the same time. That was also listed as $14. I ordered it and got confirmation that it shipped today.
Enter your email address to join: