I don't need to do double blind testing nor even extensive measurements to tell me that FM radio sounds far superior to AM.
No, you don't because there are scientifically accepted, well understood inherent reasons why those two technologies can and do sound different. There is no analogy to CD players here.
This is what I'm talking about, there was such a huge difference in sound quality between what I was used to and what I heard from the 103.
Those well understood inherent reasons I mentioned, do not exist for what you report. There's no technical reason your CD players should sound fundamentally different like this.
Very well accepted non-inherent reasons, though, *do* exist, for what you report. You haven't investigated them.
Your reports of 'blown away ' difference are not news to me. Audiophiles have been making dubious claims of big 'even my wife heard it!' differences for decades. They never pan out when investigated rigorously. They also get reported in 'phantom switch' experiments...where there is literally no difference between A and B. (Akin to putting different price tags on wine from the same bottle -- an amusing number of people report the 'pricier' glassful tastes *so much better*.)
So you don't need to tell me yet again that you heard something big and wow therefore must be real Anecdote noted, for the millionth time. Unfortunately, it proves nothing. It could very well still be just a big mistake.
I've told you why your conclusions are questionable from the POV of known science and sensory testing practice. Your beef is with that, not me. I'm just the messenger.
Now by logic the conversion process from DSD to PCM can not be perfect, I think that that is where the difference lies. I'm not saying that DSD is superior to PCM either, just that conversion of one to the other is not a perfect process.
Feel free to test that idea properly with two of your most different-sounding players, but, off the bat, the logic is faulty. DSD was *meant* from its inception back in the day, to be converted to PCM. Transparently to the ear, if not 'perfectly', since, obviously, inaudible high frequency content is discarded. The 'imperfection' should not be audible like you report. Anything that is making such a big audible difference as you report, if real, sounds like some sort of EQ, compressor, or other fiddling with levels added on -- *nothing* intrinsically to do with DSD-->PCM.
If any of you people want to do your own double blind testing that's fine with me, I just don't think that it's necessary in this case.
“Isn't it pretty to think so?” - Hemingway