Not sure if this is exactly what you mean:Looking forward to your complete video/sound review on this one Just an idea as well, why don't you do a comparison review of all "Live" multi-channel discs and which are your personal favorites
Not sure if this is exactly what you mean:Looking forward to your complete video/sound review on this one Just an idea as well, why don't you do a comparison review of all "Live" multi-channel discs and which are your personal favorites
Not sure if this is exactly what you mean:
Wow, good that you said that. I was listening to David Fricke earlier and he was talking about a Jimmy Reed album called Jimmy Reed Live At Carnegie Hall, which he did play, after the record company put out the album which was a studio recreation of the Carnegie Hall show.One thing to remember about all playback formats, Atmos included. It's not because a title is offered in multiple channel configuration that the company behind the release actually commissioned a discrete mix for that configuration.
In the 50's and 60's, record companies were notorious for selling fake Stereo albums. In the 70's, some record companies sold fake (or extremely shy) Quad albums. As 5.1 began to be used for audio in the late 90's / early 2000's, some companies (such as Silverline) did the same thing. I don't think anyone should be surprised that this will also manifest itself with Atmos releases.
I'm not looking for a fight here, I'm just stating what's been going on in the industry since 1957. At the end of the day, we would all like our multichannel content to be discrete and of demo quality but I think we may enjoy these releases more if we dialed down the level of expectation.
LMAOThe Allman Brothers Disc that Mike has in his hand is so awesome, I am going to start a thread, "Your Top 200"
Re dud 5.1 mixes, Blondie Greatest Video Hits comes to mind:It's not because a title is offered in multiple channel configuration that the company behind the release actually commissioned a discrete mix for that configuration.
In the 50's and 60's, record companies were notorious for selling fake Stereo albums. In the 70's, some record companies sold fake (or extremely shy) Quad albums. As 5.1 began to be used for audio in the late 90's / early 2000's, some companies (such as Silverline) did the same thing.
Not sure if this is exactly what you mean:
I'd didn't say best! Just awesome.Whaaaaaat? No Talking Heads...no Steely Daaaan! The best live surround mixes out there!
I’m actually surprised Steven’s 5.1 mixes aren’t more discrete, the quad mixing at the last live show I saw for the latest album was much more discrete than the 5.1 mix on the Albert Hall disc, Pariah is an obvious one, the female vocals at the live show were 100% through the surround channels, so many great quad live moments that didn’t translate to disc.
My fave discrete concert mixes are Pineapple Thief and the NIN Beside You In Time, would love to see a thread compiling some other options with member recommendations as I would gladly fill out my collection.
I wasn’t anticipating anything other than more realism with this Atmos mix, super stoked more than anything else to hear it does actually have HDR, is this the first concert with HDR?
Not sure if this is exactly what you mean:
This is the worst Atmos I’ve heard yet. Is there something wrong in the mastering or is it just a poor upmix? Thoughts anyone?
I don't have an Atmos setup, only 5.1., is the picture quality worth me buying my first 4K concert disc?
YES - the picture quality of the 4K disc is significantly better than the blu-ray.
Shot on film?
Enter your email address to join: