Question:
Anyone think that the deluxe Aqualung release lost money because it was too deluxe, i.e., expensive and that poisoned the waters for the subsequent releases?
No blu-ray, no lossless surround etc?
While I lucked into the pre-order importcds Aqualung for $75, even that was too expensive for people who only wanted the blu-ray.
I agree with RT, they're very good but could have been better.
The SW DL of Aqualung is better than the 2-channel on the BD not by a huge margin but better nonetheless.
Perhaps the POV of Anderson and the people putting these together is that DVD-V is "good enough" and the sales will be the same no matter what so why go the extra kilometer.
Timing and sales are everything in this business.
When "Aqualung" was remixed and released in surround in 2011, EMI were beginning to be on its last legs.
They took a gamble with big sets for the likes of "Aqualung", "Dark Side of the Moon", and "Wish You Were Here", and similar sets with CD, DVD, and Blu-Ray all bundled together were not repeated after that, and then EMI went completely defunct at the end of 2012. (Now the Jethro Tull catalogue falls under Warner Music.)
It is very possible that EMI did not break even on the Super Deluxe Edition of "Aqualung", and so when "Thick as a Brick" came around, they took a different tactic.
First off, they separated out the vinyl from the CDs and DVDs, which was a great move IMHO, but in the process, they cut Blu-Ray altogether, and it has not made a comeback since then, even with the catalogue move from EMI to Warner Music.
Most know that Blu-Ray costs a lot more to author and replicate than DVD does, so they probably are making back more of their money by not bothering with Blu-Ray altogether, but it just means that we don't get the best quality because of that decision.