So, you don't care for Wilson's surround mixes, then? Because they don't differ creatively/production-wise from his stereo mixes, only spatially.
Not exactly. That would be an exageration. I do care Wilson's surround mixes. In fact it was thanks to him I have entered this wonderful hobby.
Sometimes I would prefer some more agresiveness from him, but the sound quality and the very good balancing is well appreciated by me.
You are entitled to your opinion. I just want you to understand why it isn't shared by many.
Ok. I understand that the sounds flying around and ping pong (just to mention an example of mixing) is not for everyone.
I agree with the "respect" for old mixes, because I also have in mind many 70's albums that know by heart. And Steven Wilson makes good, something intermediate, that sounds "like" the original but somehow different for us to like them.
I was referring more to the style of mixing for new productions.
I have shown my installation to two of my brothers-in-law.
One of them was annoyed with multichannel music and requested me to put the AVR in stereo. He has a big stereo in his house and does not want to change.
The other one was amazed by Atmos with things like Yello-Point, and wanted sounds coming from everywere. He has a soundbar in his house, but he does not get such effects, and wants something like mine.
I think the industry has to get a lot of people impressed with good effects, so that this current push that Apple is giving to its Spatial Audio persists. My first brother-in-law is not convinced, while the second is.