Whut? Off tropic?It's "Mission Creep."
Whut? Off tropic?It's "Mission Creep."
Maybe for parts [edited^]At first read I thought you meant $200... That would have been incredible.
Maybe for parts [edited^]
There are two 103s on the bay right now for $320.
OPPO BDP-103 Universal Disc Player (SACD / DVD-Audio / 3D Blu-ray) | eBay
Not sure if this has been posted .. here’s a review of both models from sound and vision magazine .
https://www.soundandvision.com/content/reavon-ubr-x100-and-ubr-x200-ultra-hd-blu-ray-players-review
From the audio standpoint, If you can input a second players HDMI out to your Oppo 105, any 4K video player will work. The HDMI link between the players is all digital and the only DACs being used would be in the Oppo 105. So the 4K players DACs do not come into play. But how to split the audio and video from the single HDMI coming from the 4K player?Question: I run a modded Oppo 105 and 4K projector/screen. Analog outs to vintage Marantz receiver amps. 4300(quad) and 2270(center)
To add 4K disc capability, could I use an Oppo 203 or UBR-X100, sending it's HDMI audio out to the 105 and it's 4K video directly to the projector? Anybody doing this? Would a cheaper 4K player do just as well? Or would audio suffer due to cheaper DACs in a cheaper player? Or do the 4K player's DACs not come into play in this scenario?
I've been replacing my DVDs with Blu-Rays, because they look much better on the 4K capable projector and 4K screen. I want to see what improvement 4K discs deliver, to see if its worth the $ to hunt them down where available.
If the improvement is great enough, I might invest in a Oppo 205. I'm happy with my 105's audio.(Dr. Lee OppoMod linear power supply)
Please educate me on these points. Maybe it will apply to others too. Thanks!
Am I the only one who thinks that this move to 4K video is getting a bit ridiculous. 1080p looks fine to me. It was not that long ago that people were fine with the crappy video of VHS. I suppose that people think the same about us audio freaks with our ever higher resolution audio systems.Question: I run a modded Oppo 105 and 4K projector/screen. Analog outs to vintage Marantz receiver amps. 4300(quad) and 2270(center)
To add 4K disc capability, could I use an Oppo 203 or UBR-X100, sending it's HDMI audio out to the 105 and it's 4K video directly to the projector? Anybody doing this? Would a cheaper 4K player do just as well? Or would audio suffer due to cheaper DACs in a cheaper player? Or do the 4K player's DACs not come into play in this scenario?
I've been replacing my DVDs with Blu-Rays, because they look much better on the 4K capable projector and 4K screen. I want to see what improvement 4K discs deliver, to see if its worth the $ to hunt them down where available.
If the improvement is great enough, I might invest in a Oppo 205. I'm happy with my 105's audio.(Dr. Lee OppoMod linear power supply)
Please educate me on these points. Maybe it will apply to others too. Thanks!
4K is old news; step on up to the magic of 8K
(if you make it, they will come.)
Yes, yes, yes… but what about their puny speakersNeed 325-inch screen - Need it now!
Appreciate the feedback Pete; but my fault in getting us off the Reavon thread track here.Those are Dynaudio, great speaker to use with screens lesser than 8 feet wide with no center (phantom) they also go down into the low 40's. Making the sub thing optional. Here is my SONY OLED 83" setup, for a 75 grand system it gives most 500k plus systems i have done or heard a run for the investment because being nearfield gets you whacked from every direction especially in multichannel music with concussive directional bass, that feature alone is hard to reproduce in the mid-field and may be impossible in the far field giving the smallest of rooms what I value as a MILLION DOLLAR ADVANTAGE. I REALLY DO THINK IT IS THE GREATEST THING EVER. i have shown the system to 2 potential customers, we are moving ahead with both sales..
Enter your email address to join: