Roger Waters Dark Side Redux

QuadraphonicQuad

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I was deeply annoyed with how good the Atmos mix of Redux was. May pick it up on disk if it is offered outside the box set.
I’m along the same lines. I think the re-do of the songs/singing style to be more of a lounge style is in fact, a good choice that works well.

What doesn’t, is well… everything else. The poetry that beats the “meaning” of a not particularly lyrically deep album into your head, the sense that somehow he’s messing up his own reading (there’s a track, I don’t care to check which one, where he seems to restart the poem something like 5 times, before ending with “Welcome to hell”, yes Roger, listening to your poetry makes me seem like I am in fact, in hell).

I recall reading, ages ago, that the original lyrics of DSOTM were kept simple using simple English to be broadly understood by large swaths of people, and furthermore that this was a conscious decision by Waters at the albums writing and recording. Why 50 years later he thinks his own handiwork has fallen short I don’t know, and I don’t know why he chose to “fix” it by adding Vogon poetry, but I guess that’s his prerogative. I’d only be interested in a disk if it’s:

Not in a box set
And
Has a “sans poetry” option
 
SomethingAnything said:
Waters Dingalinging all over PF's greatest achievement.
I made a snarky comment a few posts back, and it was just for fun. The truth is 90% of what Waters has produced musically is pleasing to me. He is in fact one of my favorite musicians.

That said, I've had trouble appreciating the Redux. It's a creative statement for him, and I can respect that, but I didn't buy it. YouTube once was enough for me. I will say that in my mind Redux does nothing to harm the original DSOTM. It still exists in its many forms - 1973 classic, quad, Atmos, live... Take your pick.

I see Redux as an attempt to reclaim the piece with an association to his name, rather than purely a Pink Floyd production. Respect it or not, I'm satisfied with that conclusion.

I could be wrong, but I'm not sure it matters. Not to me anyway.

Oh ye Gods, my comment partially quoted out of context like that sounds rude. :LOL: My point was, it reminds me of a novelty release, rather than a serious one, like Chuck Berry's Dingaling. It really does feel like a novelty thing from Waters. Chuck Berry did amazing stuff, as does Waters. So I agree with everything you're saying.
 
SomethingAnything said:
Waters Dingalinging all over PF's greatest achievement.


Oh ye Gods, my comment partially quoted out of context like that sounds rude. :LOL: My point was, it reminds me of a novelty release, rather than a serious one, like Chuck Berry's Dingaling. It really does feel like a novelty thing from Waters. Chuck Berry did amazing stuff, as does Waters. So I agree with everything you're saying.
Sorry... I wasn't upset at your comment. It's actually pretty apt to compare it to a novelty record, or even a parody. My main point is that to me the new one doesn't damage the old one.
 
Back
Top