Argus needs a good surround mix as well. Brilliant album.
Argus needs a good surround mix as well. Brilliant album.
I am counting on it.I'd really like to know what the other title is before ordering a bundle. Guessing they'll tell us before the Avalon cut-off date?
You get a surround mix (the True HD base for the Atmos) done from the earlier lossless analogue multitracks, rather than the lossy digital multitracks claimed to be used to mix the SACD (and a basic upmix for India).Lovethis album. But if I don’t need Atmos does this release offer anything my SACD doesn’t already have? Doesn’t look like it.
If you're only equipped for 5.1 listening, then I don't think there's any reason to order this Blu-Ray (unless you're really jonesing to hear a true surround version of India).Lovethis album. But if I don’t need Atmos does this release offer anything my SACD doesn’t already have? Doesn’t look like it.
Apparently they weren't lossy, but 16/44 (actually a higher sampling rate than that). Thanks to @sjcorne for linking this article: https://www.mixonline.com/recording/avalon-surround-best-gets-better-377114You get a surround mix (the True HD base for the Atmos) done from the earlier lossless analogue multitracks, rather than the lossy digital multitracks claimed to be used to mix the SACD (and a basic upmix for India).
I'm intrigued now, I didn't know lossy digital multitracks were a thing. I know about lossy codecs obviously, but not that they were ever used for multi track masters. And I don't count digitising the analogue masters at 16/44.1 LPCM or similar as lossy, that's lossless to me.
Hopefully, our friend Paul is assuming that Avalon buyers will also want it. Otherwise he is maybe creating a lot of extra work for himself with a lot of potential cancellations.