gave it an 8
Sound quality is fine, surround mix well done
Sound quality is fine, surround mix well done
Good to know! So early digital mixing devices could have compromised the end result. Hopefully modern mixes will be compromise-free!According to my MoFi disc, this was an Analog recording that was digitally mixed.
View attachment 62517
Hi, Surly! 16-bit sampling, maybe?! But feel free to educate us all! In an assholish way, if you must!What sort of damage could a 1980 digital mixing device conceivably have done, that you are hearing on the original mix? By 1980 digital mixing had been used on excellent sounding releases by e.g., Ry Cooder, Stevie Wonder, and Fleetwood Mac. In 1982, a year after Moving Pictures, Peter Gabriel released Security and Donald Fagan released the Nightfly, DDD albums that are both commonplace on 'audiophile quality' recording lists.
Wouldn't any 'compromise' of the sound of MP, supposedly due to digital mixing, more likely simply be choices that the tracking, mix, and/or mastering engineers made?
which is the opposite of one of my favorite and very underrated albums...yeah, how do you follow "The Crossing"???--like this!According to my MoFi disc, this was an Analog recording that was digitally mixed.
View attachment 62517
Hi, Surly! 16-bit sampling, maybe?! But feel free to educate us all! In an assholish way, if you must!
The same for my copy.I used to like this release. But now my bluray disc is rot and unplayable... I saw that it happened with copies of other people as well.
Jeez... really. I'm glad I backed-up my discI used to like this release. But now my bluray disc is rot and unplayable... I saw that it happened with copies of other people as well.
The same for my copy.
https://www.quadraphonicquad.com/fo...sary-edition-blu-ray-audio-dolby-atmos.32267/Am I missing it or is there not a poll for the Atmos version? Or does this thread cover all surround of Moving Pictures?
Thanks. I had searched in the Surround Polls section, but only this one showed up.