HiRez Poll Seal - SEAL (1991 album) [Blu-ray Audio (Dolby Atmos)]

QuadraphonicQuad

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Rate the BDA of Seal - SEAL (1991 album)

  • 7

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1: Terrible Content, Surround Mix, and Fidelity

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    8
Hi,
for your (and everyone's) information, the 5.1 on this blu-ray (mixed by Trevor Horn) is not the same as the one from the 2005 DVD-Audio (mixed by Tim Weidner)

Thanks! That's surprising... and interesting! The 5.1 mix is noticeably different than how the Atmos mix folds down to 5.1, so that's pretty cool. Quite a few mixes of this album for folks to choose from.
 
Thanks! That's surprising... and interesting! The 5.1 mix is noticeably different than how the Atmos mix folds down to 5.1, so that's pretty cool. Quite a few mixes of this album for folks to choose from.
Unfortunate, however, that Tim Weidner's 5.1 is stuck on an OOP DVD-A. I was hoping it would be included on this Blu-ray. šŸ˜•
 
I took the time this morning to listen to the first minute of a few tracks in 5.1 on both the blu-ray and the 2005 DVD-A.
I still use my old Denon DBP-4010UD player with its analog 5.1 output. Both discs were played this way.
I cannot say that I'm able to spot any difference between the two mixes. To my ears, they're identical. The mastering is not the same for sure, but the sounds that come from the rear speakers are placed exactly the same on both mixes. The front stage is the same.
I assume that the credits in the blu-ray booklet are wrong and misleading.
 
I'm very surprised that the 5.1 DTS-HD MA stream and the 2.0 (stereo) DTS-HD MA stream contains Dialnorm encoded at -9dB and -6dB respectively!

Dialnorm is more an Dolby thing and true to form the Atmos stream is encoded with the usual -31dB...

EDIT: By contrast, the Carly Simon Blu-ray has no Dialnorm on the 4.0 (quad) and 2.0 (stereo) DTS-HD MA streams but it does have -9dB Dialnorm on the 5.1 DTS-HD MA stream.
 
Last edited:
The "hi-res" stereo mix is apparently 24/48 instead of the indicated 24/96 for both albums. The DVD-Audios were 24/88.2, not that a higher bit rate alone indicates superior audio quality,
Maybe the 24/96 mixes are hidden on the disc?

Eather way that's false advertising
 
Last edited:
Maybe the 24/96 mixes are hidden on the disc?

Eather way that's fulse advertising
The 5.1 DTS-HD MA stream is 96/24...

Code:
Audio
ID                                       : 1
ID in the original source medium         : 4353 (0x1101)
Format                                   : DTS XLL
Format/Info                              : Digital Theater Systems
Commercial name                          : DTS-HD Master Audio
Codec ID                                 : A_DTS
Duration                                 : 52 min 17 s
Bit rate mode                            : Variable
Bit rate                                 : 6 780 kb/s
Channel(s)                               : 6 channels
Channel layout                           : C L R Ls Rs LFE
Sampling rate                            : 96.0 kHz
Frame rate                               : 93.750 FPS (1024 SPF)
Bit depth                                : 24 bits
Compression mode                         : Lossless
Stream size                              : 2.48 GiB (100%)
Title                                    : Surround 5.1
Language                                 : English
Default                                  : No
Forced                                   : No
Original source medium                   : Blu-ray

The lossy DTS 'core' is sadly 48/24...
 
Back
Top