Black Hole Sun? Red Hot Sun apparently
Black Hole Sun? Red Hot Sun apparently
WTF??? I can't imagine ever a situation where THIS much compression is warranted. Is this a joke JPG???
John Lennon said:
"Give Peace A Chance"
Now, Good Sir Keenly has given us more wisdom to live by:
" just let the natural dynamics flow"
Even very intense music needs to have dynamics. This is really amazing......wow.
WTF??? I can't imagine ever a situation where THIS much compression is warranted. Is this a joke JPG???
John Lennon said:
"Give Peace A Chance"
Now, Good Sir Keenly has given us more wisdom to live by:
" just let the natural dynamics flow"
Even very intense music needs to have dynamics. This is really amazing......wow.
Indeed. I bet some thought I was being harsh or too picky.
Hey hey, why you are so frustrated about compression on this one.
Don't forget it is a slamming rock album!
It has to be more compressed than other styles of music.
So how did bands like Kiss, King Crimson, Alice Cooper, Nazareth, Rush, The Police, ZZ Top, The Clash, Van Halen, Deep Purple, AC/DC, etc. manage to release perfectly fine "slamming rock" albums that were DR12 or better? That is why I am frustrated about the compression. It is completely unnecessary. We had plenty of loud hard rock back in the 80's with more than double the dynamic range and no one was complaining.
So how did bands like Kiss, King Crimson, Alice Cooper, Nazareth, Rush, The Police, ZZ Top, The Clash, Van Halen, Deep Purple, AC/DC, etc. manage to release perfectly fine "slamming rock" albums that were DR12 or better? That is why I am frustrated about the compression. It is completely unnecessary. We had plenty of loud hard rock back in the 80's with more than double the dynamic range and no one was complaining.
Next thing you know, some idiot here will be bashing 80's music, geesh!
I hope everybody's listening to the 5.1 in DTS HD MA and not the Dolby True HD.. the latter stream flags up +4 dB worth of Dialog Normalization.. @:
What is wrong with that? From what I've read, DTS is by it's nature 4dB louder than Dolby Digital, so it would seem that the +4db DialNorm on the Dolby would be intended to keep them the same on playback. Is that wrong?
I've mentioned it here before, many HFPA Blu-ray's from Universal suffer from this anomaly.
The Dolby True HD on every Blu-ray Audio I've ever heard that has Dial. Norm sounds louder than the equivalent DTS HD MA and/or PCM - and that applies to both 2.0 and 5.1 streams.
Why you'd want or need or use Dialog Normalization on a 2-channel source without a centre channel nobody has been able to explain the apparent logic to me to this day (and I've asked the question several times here and @SHF.tv and @sa-cd.net).
Grab an HFPA or BD-A from Universal, check out the Dolby True and then the DTS HD of the same repertoire and see if you can hear any difference in volume levels. Chances are you can.
What's wrong with it here in particular, is that the Superunknown Dolby True HD 5.1 sounds significantly louder than the DTS HD MA 5.1.. and I don't see how that can be a good thing, especially with an already DR compressed mastering.
But it is purely a volume shift, there is no compression involved. I think it is silly and redundant to have multiple 5.1 versions in the first place, but I don't think DialNorm does anything harmful that adjusting the volume control doesn't correct.
Dialog Normalization is not like a simple overall (all channels) volume compensation.
It's not intended for music ever.
From QQ deep space
Enter your email address to join: