Sadly, Jefe, I've owned them both forever, but never A/B'd them. They're attached to different systems and I'm lazy these days. I A/B'd my Marantz SQA-2B to the SQA-1 briefly when I upgraded in '76 ish. Yes, the SQA-2B sounds better. I purchased the SQD-2010 from a customer who was getting out of Quad in early '75 for $25. Like my Onkyo TX-SR504 at $39, it wasn't needed, but was too good a bargain to pass up. He had only used the 2010 for a few months. The SQD-2020 was bought on accommodation for $100 ish.
SQD-2020 is so much more than a decoder, of course. It's also a control center, tape loops, rear preamp and has pretty meters. These days, it's just one of 6 black boxes attached to my B&K Reference 50 surround preamp, along with a JVC 4DD-5, Russound QT-1, Ortofon T 20, Technics SH-3433 and dbx 224. The SQD-2010 is attached to my Denon AVR-3801, along with my Technics SH-400. I use the SQ decoders for matrix records only, not for synthesis. I prefer synthesizing within the respective preamps or receivers, in order to maintain a shorter signal path.
Disclord could probably compare the chipsets and decoding differences. The SQD-2010 was touted as being full-logic wavematching, though I've had service techs tell me it isn't.
Next year, I plan to buy either a VPI or Rek-o-Kut w/an Ortofon moving coil, a VPI record cleaning system, Lou's demod, a Tate, a Sansui decoder & Oppo BDP-95.
There were some better SQ decoders released later, but the SQD-2020 is the prettiest decoder ever made. The SH-3433 scope atop it make for a gorgeous couple. My modern gear performs better, but the vintage '70's gear looks far more impressive. Just a woman's opinion.
Linda the Donnamatrix
I have read that the Sony 2010 has better components in it. Linda, have you compared your 2020 and the 2010 for any audible differences?