It sucks to hear about all of these great albums being quad-blocked by these other labels who show no interest in saving the old quad mixes. WTF?
It's a shame AF could not just license the surround and release a surround only disc, but I doubt that would be cost effective for them and they operate on very small margins to begin with I'm sure. They'd probably have to charge $50 retail a disc and then we'd all be bitching about the price!
Yes, this roll-out of quad on SACD is a couple years later than it should have been. Now if they started with "A Space in Time" just to test the waters things would have been further along right about now.
There really is a lot of politics involved in these releases and the format. Many potential risks, and bumps in the road. Look how many decades it took to get us where we are now.
If the request for a quad title is presented as a sure fire hit, then the label can question why they have not considered it themselves, and thus decline the request thinking it might be their own future reissue. The person in catalog dev could worry about their missed opportunity. Insecurity runs rampant in the record business at this time.
I think that this series is about to turn a corner, as I mentioned previously, once AF have issued 25 titles of A-List artists, and all have received favorable reviews and were not commercial duds, then the format gets more of the respect it deserves. To many this whole thing is still in beta. LOL.