kap'n krunch
2K Club - QQ Super Nova
I did both. I have thousands of Kodachrome/Ektachrome transparencies and used to do slide shows with dissolves and soundtracks. But my first love was motion picture film/editing/even writing music for my mini dramas/comedies. And yes, seilerbird, a singular picture does speak a thousand words if well executed. I gave up photography when the cable channels started to go wild with the likes of National Geographic and the History Channel in HD. Who could possibly compete with that........the most exotic of locations reachable only by helicopter or hiking.
And now that we can actually shoot 4K on our cellphones and edit on our computers, I've given it up altogether. But then I suppose running a complicated business in 2017 will do that to you.
BTW, I miss the viewfinder which is sadly absent from today's digital cameras. It really taught me how to frame and focus........two 'good' habits which have remained with me even to this day.
I know the costs of film photography are prohibitive now (although Kodak DID start to produce Ektachrome film AGAIN!!!!),
but,
there is no substitute for film....
Sorry, but digital photography is wonderful, but it doesn't cut it for me; especially in movie theaters; I find it "lifeless". Give me a 35mm print anytime-its vibrance is something else.
I know that a 35mm frame is no more than 2500 horizontal lines of resolution, but that's all I need (unless you wanna go for "Vistavision", where they print it sideways; and those cameras were used for special fx until very recently.)
As it is, if I'm not mistaken, the files that are shown on cinemas are "around" 2K horizontal resolution...
The whole 4K or even 8K is definitely overkill, same as 192 KHz recording (when 96K will do the trick perfectly).
I STILL use my film camera, and I'm hoping they bring back slide film, cause it was "HEAVEN".