Jens
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2005
- Messages
- 86
My understanding of blu-ray profile 3.0 is that it's EXACTLY the same as the blu-ray video format, just with no obligation for advanced blu-ray video features (BD-J, and maybe PiP). I.e. you could manufacture a "Blu-ray profile 3.0 ONLY" player if you wanted (which is a bit silly anyway as you'd want to have movie playback as well). In other words, Blu-ray video IS Blu-ray audio, it's exactly the same format (unlike DVD-Audio compared to DVD-Video). It's more comparable to Audio CD vs. CD-ROM, but even better - NO new physical technology is required ANYWHERE, industry or consumer-side. ALL that would be required, is for the recording/CES industry to market it and call it something like "Blu CD" with its own logo. EVERY blu-ray player ALREADY out there supports it, NOW. And every tool which allows you to make a BD disc (of which there are already numerous free ones) can already make a "blu-ray audio" disc. We just need to give it a good name and logo so that average consumers can understand what it is.
You've got it almost right. The tricky thing is that BD Profile 3.0 is not a disc profile but a player profile. I haven't been involved in BD standardistion for the last couple of years but a colleague of mine who has been explained this to me. It's a subset of a regular BD player. Apparently, not only BD-Java can be dispensed with, also video decoding, though not graphics decoding, from what I gathered.
I don't expect it to catch on. The only place I could imagine for such devices would be the car but DVD-Audio has not been the smashing success that warrants high expectations. And there have never been any portable DVD-Audio players, have there? All home devices have been 'hybrid' DVD-Audio/Video players.