jimfisheye
2K Club - QQ Super Nova
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
- Messages
- 3,665
FLAC is like zip. The highest compression and smallest file size is still lossless. They don't allow going so low that data is actually thrown away.This geeky bit-rate is where I am clearly falling short in full comprehension of lossless compression. In a general search, some have said that a higher bit-rate yields a more accurate mathematical restoration, aka more pure sound. Those bit-rates for stereo files can range lets say between 2,000 and 3,000 kbps, depending on the level chosen. We all know that bit-rate matters for MP3 files... thus why would it be any different for FLAC? That is a rhetorical Q. I am still a bit stumped, but hearing that it may not matter for Lossless formats based on the above comments. Frankly, bit-depth is the most meaningful number to me, followed by sampling rate... and now I have become hyper focused on this bit-rate as my geeky side explodes out of my head.
Lossy compression throws low level data away. It would be like a zip format that discards any pages of your document beyond page 10. (Then maybe a higher bit-rate only discards after page 20.)
In lossy formats, bit-rate lines up with remaining fidelity.
In lossless formats it's all about storage size. Actual data loss isn't allowed.