Films (Almost Entirely Surround)

[MarkerB]

I think part of the problem for a lot of people--certainly for me--is that anything from DVD onward is generally good enough.

[snip]

I'm far more interested in 3D than 4k and remain sad that it's no longer possible to get 3D without going the projector route, which simply won't work for me.

I really appreciate you expressing your thoughts here. I am not in full alignment with you about DVD being good enough, and 3D never really worked for me. However, your articulate post makes it easier for me to honor these personal preferences many people have.

 

[atrocity]

I really appreciate you expressing your thoughts here. I am not in full alignment with you about DVD being good enough, and 3D never really worked for me. However, your articulate post makes it easier for me to honor these personal preferences many people have.

Just to be clear, if I'm presented with a format choice, I'll get the highest-rez one there is. But I own hundreds of titles on DVD that I'll happily watch again but probably will never bother to upgrade.

It's not that I can't see the difference between DVD and better, it's just that DVD isn't (to me) actively, annoyingly bad. And I think I'm just really, really happy that I no longer have to worry about how many times I'm going to have to exchange the Laserdisc to finally get one without crosstalk or hiss pumping or helicoptering.

I have so many titles from the 1980s and 1990s on CED or Laserdisc that I really shouldn't have accepted or kept, but I just knew the odds of getting something better were slim. Certainly not all DVDs are well-mastered, but at least I almost never have to worry about the kind of manufacturing defects that get in the way while I'm watching.

At some point before US TV went to stereo, a local station ran 2001: A Space Odyssey as their evening movie. They made a big deal for weeks in advance about how they were going to simulcast it on an FM station in stereo and oh boy it's gonna be so awesome, etc. The night finally came and it was a sonic disaster. They were running it from one of the old analog-only Laserdiscs and it was just a constant sea of noise. Sure, it was in stereo, but it sounded horrible, which sadly was the case with a lot of analog Laserdiscs. (And they also cut Leonard Rossiter's scene for time, the *******s!)

Some time later they ran Saturn 3 and, thanks to the "barber pole", that was also really obviously from a Laserdisc.

I guess I just spent so much time putting up with actual defects on top of the inherently less than great old formats that I can be happy now with something that's at least reliable, if arguably mediocre.

 

[skherbeck]

Just to be clear, if I'm presented with a format choice, I'll get the highest-rez one there is. But I own hundreds of titles on DVD that I'll happily watch again but probably will never bother to upgrade.

It's not that I can't see the difference between DVD and better, it's just that DVD isn't (to me) actively, annoyingly bad. And I think I'm just really, really happy that I no longer have to worry about how many times I'm going to have to exchange the Laserdisc to finally get one without crosstalk or hiss pumping or helicoptering.

I have so many titles from the 1980s and 1990s on CED or Laserdisc that I really shouldn't have accepted or kept, but I just knew the odds of getting something better were slim. Certainly not all DVDs are well-mastered, but at least I almost never have to worry about the kind of manufacturing defects that get in the way while I'm watching.

At some point before US TV went to stereo, a local station ran 2001: A Space Odyssey as their evening movie. They made a big deal for weeks in advance about how they were going to simulcast it on an FM station in stereo and oh boy it's gonna be so awesome, etc. The night finally came and it was a sonic disaster. They were running it from one of the old analog-only Laserdiscs and it was just a constant sea of noise. Sure, it was in stereo, but it sounded horrible, which sadly was the case with a lot of analog Laserdiscs. (And they also cut Leonard Rossiter's scene for time, the *******s!)

Some time later they ran Saturn 3 and, thanks to the "barber pole", that was also really obviously from a Laserdisc.

I guess I just spent so much time putting up with actual defects on top of the inherently less than great old formats that I can be happy now with something that's at least reliable, if arguably mediocre.

Wow, I remember the old days of “stereo simulcasts”, lol... a couple favorites growing up were “Earthquake” and “Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band” (with The Bee Gees)... fun stuff!

 

[MarkerB]

Just to be clear, if I'm presented with a format choice, I'll get the highest-rez one there is.

Oh, whoops. I think I already understood what you meant. Sorry if I made it sound like you couldn't tell the difference!

Thanks for the walk down memory lane; I had totally forgot about simulcasts. I grew up in the sticks (and still am in the sticks... and still growing up), so simulcasts were rarely available. The FM stations choices are more limited.

Most of what I remember was that simulcasts were unacceptably out of sync, but at least the prospects made me very excited.

 

[4-earredwonder]

I think part of the problem for a lot of people--certainly for me--is that anything from DVD onward is generally good enough. It's not that I can't see the difference between DVD and Blu-ray and 4k, it's that when I sit and watch a DVD I don't spend the whole time thinking "This isn't good enough and could have been so much better!" I certainly did that with VHS and CED and Laserdisc, but the shortcomings that bothered me most about the analog formats (low resolution, crosstalk, noise, skipping [with CED]) generally don't exist with DVD.

Having said that, there are certain titles I'm a complete sucker for and have multiple-dipped over and over and over and over for, all the way up to 4k. But there are others where I'll probably always be happy with the DVD.

It's probably relevant that I don't have an enormous TV. I'm not even exactly sure how big it is, I think somewhere in the low 50s.

I'm far more interested in 3D than 4k and remain sad that it's no longer possible to get 3D without going the projector route, which simply won't work for me.

I, too, am a HUGE fan of 3D especially since I've had my LG 3D Curved Flatscreen and added a OPPO 205 plugged DIRECTLY into the TV Monitor with a Sunyata Research HDMI cable. It really looks stunning and REAL 3D especially looks phenomenol although there are some exceptional 3D conversions like Jurassic Park and Titanic. And I will say that well done 3D competes favorably with a lot of 'UPSCALED' 4K releases.

ZAVVI in the UK does release a few on occasion but as time goes by without LG, Samsung and SONY supporting the format, there's really NO incentive for the major studios to continue releasing them.

I do have a new SONY 3D Laser Projector on order and am installing a 120" Stewart filmscreen but because of Covid 19 everything's on hold at present.

 

[Snood]

KNIVES OUT - Free Awesome Movie just went live for Amazon Prime streaming members 4K or HD https://www.amazon.com/Knives-Out-U...scsubtag=36109188acf711ea83d0bafcfc5720790INT or
https://www.amazon.com/Knives-Out-A...scsubtag=58b5c9baacf711eaa6e97276c69fe3700INT

 

[timothyemerson]

First Blood (1982) 4K:
1. Not much going on in the surrounds unfortunately. Even the opportunity to do some reverb when there's yelling up in the canyon was missed.
2. Picture detail/colour isn't as pronounced as other 4K's but I'm guessing that's mostly down to the overcast weather throughout most of the movie. Fire is nice and bright though. Weirdly, once Trautman arrives at the police station at the end, image detail improves. Could have just been police lights reflecting off their faces though.
3. Still a fun movie. I forgot how damaged Rambo was in this one. He isn't the unflappable machine from the sequels (still haven't seen Last Blood yet though). Sly's performance at the end is excellent.

 

[salsdali]

First Blood (1982) 4K:
1. Not much going on in the surrounds unfortunately. Even the opportunity to do some reverb when there's yelling up in the canyon was missed.
2. Picture detail/colour isn't as pronounced as other 4K's but I'm guessing that's mostly down to the overcast weather throughout most of the movie. Fire is nice and bright though. Weirdly, once Trautman arrives at the police station at the end, image detail improves. Could have just been police lights reflecting off their faces though.
3. Still a fun movie. I forgot how damaged Rambo was in this one. He isn't the unflappable machine from the sequels (still haven't seen Last Blood yet though). Sly's performance at the end is excellent.

I actually saw this in High-Def (1080i) on TV a couple of months ago and was surprised at how good it looked. I was also surprised how good the movie was after not having seen it for like 30 years.

 

[Clement]

enjoying the look + sound of Baz Luhrmann's modern adaptation

https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/46011/william-shakespeares-romeo-juliet/

 

[Snood]

KNIVES OUT - Free Awesome Movie just went live for Amazon Prime streaming members 4K or HD https://www.amazon.com/Knives-Out-U...scsubtag=36109188acf711ea83d0bafcfc5720790INT or
https://www.amazon.com/Knives-Out-A...scsubtag=58b5c9baacf711eaa6e97276c69fe3700INT

Ahh cmon this movie Rox watch it this weekend... is still 5.99 on most streaming rental services. Snood Swear u will love it or you money back (which is 0)

 

[Scott65]

Ahh cmon this movie Rox watch it this weekend... is still 5.99 on most streaming rental services. Snood Swear u will love it or you money back (which is 0)

Great movie - I saw it at the cinema.

 

[Scott65]

It's not that I can't see the difference between DVD and better, it's just that DVD isn't (to me) actively, annoyingly bad. And I think I'm just really, really happy that I no longer have to worry about how many times I'm going to have to exchange the Laserdisc to finally get one without crosstalk or hiss pumping or helicoptering.

Well mastered DVDs can look quite good - for example if a high (for DVD) bitrate is used. I see blu ray's two biggest strengths (for picture quality) are 1. Higher resolution (the obvious advantage) and 2. Much higher bitrate than DVD.

 

[J. PUPSTER]

Ahh cmon this movie Rox watch it this weekend... is still 5.99 on most streaming rental services. Snood Swear u will love it or you money back (which is 0)

Watched it tonight, fun little romp- owe Snood nada zilch but all love and best wishes Free popcorn?

 

[Snood]

Watched it tonight, fun little romp- owe Snood nada zilch but all love and best wishes Free popcorn?

U did not like it? wow

Thought it was awesome so unlike the James Bond Stuff that he does......he did a great job and the cast was awesome.....holes in plot maybe but was fun and in 4K toooooo

 

[J. PUPSTER]

U did not like it? wow

Thought it was awesome so unlike the James Bond Stuff that he does......he did a great job and the cast was awesome.....holes in plot maybe but was fun and in 4K toooooo

Yes I liked a lot ... very cool, warm and fuzzy too - Popcorn ???

 

[Eggplant]

Criterion has released over 1000 DVD/BD~Vs over their illustrious career and for the past few years, a majority have been 'remastered in 4K from the original camera negatives.'

But Criterion has never released a Native UHD 4K disc. And from reading a lot of the threads from posters on various movie forums, this has deterred a lot of them from supporting Criterion.

Lame.

Criterion, to me, has always been more of a cult (as with Mobile Fidelity for audio) than a genuine standard-bearer of quality. They’ve never shown much interest in the latest technology. I remember them still hawking their $100 LaserDisc of 2001 which wasn’t even transferred from the original 70mm negative like the studio release.

 

[atrocity]

Criterion, to me, has always been more of a cult (as with Mobile Fidelity for audio) than a genuine standard-bearer of quality. They’ve never shown much interest in the latest technology. I remember them still hawking their $100 LaserDisc of 2001 which wasn’t even transferred from the original 70mm negative like the studio release.

It also didn't show the entire width, but I think that was at Kubrick's request. Doesn't matter now since the discs were pressed by 3M and rotted long ago.

I'm pretty sure that the MGM Laserdisc from 65/70mm didn't come out until later. I remember it being a big deal when West Side Story came to video from >35mm because it allegedly had never been done before.

Also, the MGM 2001 disc required a side flip to see the end credits!

 

[Clement]

40th Anniversary Blu-ray Woodstock!

https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/65015/woodstock-40th-anniversary/

 

[The56Kid]

40th Anniversary Blu-ray Woodstock!
View attachment 52547
https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/65015/woodstock-40th-anniversary/

Love that pic!

 

[edisonbaggins]

40th Anniversary Blu-ray Woodstock!
View attachment 52547
https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/65015/woodstock-40th-anniversary/

I wonder if that's the version I have ?!