Like you, I've been around surround since the first dvd-a's in the early 2000s. Unlike you, I try not to form any preconceived notions about how the material should be handled, and don't really have a personal preference other than puking on those 'send a reverb to the rears' faux surround releases. Sea Change and Animals are both exceptional recordings and surround mixes, but neither have the number of instruments playing simultaneously that the Zappa or a full orchestra would have, hence the necessity to mix the music into surround so you can actually hear everything. So while I'm hopeful you'll approach the Zappa bluray with a more open mind next time, I'm less hopeful anything posted here is going to change your mind since you seemed to double down on your 'opinion' overriding the actual answer/explanation. If anything your takeaway is unfortunate for you, since the mix is what it is. I guess just listen to the stereo mix through NEO.I own dozens of surround mixes going back to the early 2000s when I first got a budget home theater. I got Sea Change and Yoshimi 5.1 when they were released and loved them. I used to want things panned everywhere all the time, but as time goes on I prefer more variety and subtlety in the mixes. Pink Floyd's Animals is very pleasing to me (I'm not a huge PF fan, but that might be my favorite surround mix).
I understand your point about all the instruments benefiting from being spread out - and I agree to some extent, but I just don't care for how it was done on many parts of this release. I've studied surround for a long time, and I've mixed some albums myself. It's a personal taste thing.
What I'm saying is -- your criticism comes across as more contrarian than connoisseur.
Last edited: