You're overselling the script. Yeah, it's the best I've ever heard QS, but it doesn't sound remotely like discrete, it's probably not the script. it's probably the encoding, but the QS technology was just lacking, always the ugly stepsister to CD-4 & SQ.
Yeah, but that ugly step-sister survived long enough to beget all the Dolby analog systems up to and including Pro Logic II...where are SQ and CD-4 now?
(Sounds vaguely like a Cinderella story!)
They ALL have their place, but few decoders can make a nice quad effect out of regular stereo like a Variomatrix does!
QS was more a POOR step-sister, in a large part because Columbia had the clout to swamp the market with SQ albums, and Sony on their side to make sure there were plenty of decoders. Sansui did a poor job of "pushing" QS (they DIDN'T own a giant record company), and if their last generation of decoders had been out five years earlier, SQ may not have even made it out of the gate.
We've seen this all before...VHS won on marketing merits even though Beta was better, but Beta evolved to become the pro format for TV broadcast. (Betacam)
I like what oxforddickie is doing, making quad material available to anybody that can decode DTS...far more people have an A/V receiver than have a quad one.
BUT, I still like the old analog stuff, too...it's uncompressed, it works in real time, and there is the above-mentioned quad synthesis ability.
Oxforddickie, are you considering in the future putting out product in a high-bit-rate format like Blu-Ray? Maybe uncompressed 24-bit/96 kHz? I'D sure buy it!
tB