Owen Smith
2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Tigger on drums would be awesome.Pooh's name definitely doesn't travel. Massive in Italy and South America.
Tigger on drums would be awesome.Pooh's name definitely doesn't travel. Massive in Italy and South America.
Yep. You're right. ;-) Yesterday I've listened to the Early Years 5.1 Mix. It's really bad at all, but I thought this was the correct running order. Pre-orded the new BD disc.You are confused!
The Early Years was a bastardization of the original film. This new release is presented in the original running order of the film.
Can you be more specific about what you mean by digitally identical? I can extract all versions and compare them with a null test to show the digital difference if that helps.Presuming they're all fed identical audio for encoding, that DTS-HD MA, Dolby TrueHD and LPCM are digitally identical upon decoding is a statement of fact, unlike 'we prefer DTS' which is an opinion. There's no need to be condescending to people who take the time to reply to yoru queries, even if it isn't the response you were looking for.
If they're different then a different LPCM master was used to encode them. DTS HD MA and Dolby True HD are lossless, you get the same LPCM out on decode as was put in on encode.Can you be more specific about what you mean by digitally identical? I can extract all versions and compare them with a null test to show the digital difference if that helps.
This is probably a discussion best left for another thread, outside of Pink Floyd.If they're different then a different LPCM master was used to encode them. DTS HD MA and Dolby True HD are lossless, you get the same LPCM out on decode as was put in on encode.
I never said anything about Atmos and I am aware that extracting the height channels from the 7.1 True HD is not and cannot be lossless. But if I had meant Atmos or DTS X I would have said so.You believe that a TrueHD Atmos mix rendered to 5.1 will be identical to a DTS HD MA mix rendered to 5.1?
That is exactly what I'm talking about. DTS HD MA and Dolby True HD are precisely zip style compression systems.We aren’t talking about zipping and unzipping a file to get a file without losses.
Ah. Tough to follow things. We can make this easy. I’ll get 5.1 versions of the same album in TrueHD and DTS and null test them. No sense in using only partial information.I never said anything about Atmos and I am aware that extracting the height channels from the 7.1 True HD is not and cannot be lossless. But if I had meant Atmos or DTS X I would have said so.
That is exactly what I'm talking about. DTS HD MA and Dolby True HD are precisely zip style compression systems.
EDIT: This all started with the question "Is the 5.1 Dolby or DTS". Note specifically the 5.1 mix, clearly nothing to do with the separate Atmos mix:
https://www.quadraphonicquad.com/fo...ven-wilson-mix-may-2nd-2025.37201/post-838478
I ordered mine from rarewaves, its £22.31 but if you use the 10% off code RWFEB10 - MUST END SATURDAY 9PM tonight its £20.08 and you get free shipping. https://www.rarewaves.com/products/...0E*MTc0MDg1NTQ3OC4xLjAuMTc0MDg1NTQ3OC4wLjAuMA..Link still inactive for the UK blu ray on Amazon....what gives?
Do you have an album that is in both DTS HD MA and True HD and you know the same mix was used as the source for both? It seems strange to me that any album would have both on. You sometimes get LPCM and one of the lossless compressed codecs.I’ll get 5.1 versions of the same album in TrueHD and DTS and null test them. No sense in using only partial information.