Not going there on that!
I don't blame you....taking the high road. I would as well.
Not going there on that!
One thing that occurs to me, that maybe nobody is quite appreciating, is that Div Bell was a "start again' mix, in which I severely disregarded the existing stereo mix, except for essential balance relationships, as I don't like the stereo mix. If that new mix had been stereo, it still would've been 'radically different'.
All the other albums (on a island, endless river and the new DG) are working from the stereo mix (as they were done at the same time), as is the brief, so they essentially sound like the stereos, except in surround. Maybe what everyone really likes about Div Bell is the less screwed up mix
Not that I said that of course
One thing that occurs to me, that maybe nobody is quite appreciating, is that Div Bell was a "start again' mix, in which I severely disregarded the existing stereo mix, except for essential balance relationships, as I don't like the stereo mix. If that new mix had been stereo, it still would've been 'radically different'.
All the other albums (on a island, endless river and the new DG) are working from the stereo mix (as they were done at the same time), as is the brief, so they essentially sound like the stereos, except in surround. Maybe what everyone really likes about Div Bell is the less screwed up mix
Not that I said that of course
I could have matched (more or less) the stereo, just didn't want to. FWIW the surround was also mixed from the analogue tapes.
I always hope for aggressive surround mixes...I know bands usually resist this approach...but you have the stereo version for those that just want the status quo...just making the stereo sound "expanded" doesn't really make it a surround mix for ME...and BTW...the Pink Floyd Store(both US and UK)had more of the DVD-5.1 Division Bell discs for sale again...and sourcing from the analogue tapes makes me VERY HAPPY...keep up the great work Andy and thanks for taking the time to stop by here...it's a rare opportunity for us to be able to chat with someone in your position:worthy
In this day and age, there is plenty of room on bluray media to have more than one mix to please everyone. I prefer the agressive mix 95% of the time. Imagine a version of Animals with an AJ quad mix, a SW 5.1, and a JG 5.1 to please everyone. I say don't even bother with a stereo mix, have that as a download code and use the origional analog with a touch of remaster, 24/192 of course
I agree...except for the 192...it's overkill...
Hello Andy,
With Rattle that Lock mixes finished you must be enjoying a well deserved summer holidays!
Will you be anyhow involved in the tour?
Apart from your solo album, any other stuff to keep you busy until the end of the year?
Thanks!
No I'm not on the tour, it's Colin, same as last time. No quads, although I believe it'll be arenas in the States, so it'd be possible for that (although that's just speculation on my part)
My understanding is that both "Gilmour" and "Waters" present all their concerts in Quad and advertise as such.Has this practice now ceased?
No, no, OAI tour was not in quad for example (neither was About Face tour AFAIK). Quad is more of a Roger's affair
I scored 12th row center tickets for The Wall in the Air Canada Centre, Toronto though the Waters' lottery system. We went early to try to trade our tickets to a scalper for seats farther back, to be in the center of the floor where we could better experience the quad sound, as I had experienced it at the original Wall concert in NYC. Believe it or not, the senior scalper looked at my tickets and talked me out of trading down, exclaiming that these were excellent seats and we should keep them!
When we were in our seats, I scanned the arena and could not see any surround speakers, then went to the mixer to enquire where they were. He pointed out that there were some extra speakers in the flown platform dead center - where the projectors and lights were mounted and that was it. Therefore, we were in the perfect spot between the mains and the center speakers. There was rarely any noticible action from those speakers. The helicopter sound, for example, and nothing as dramatic or satisfying as the original concerts' surround work. The main system sounded great, however, and our seats were perfect for taking in the whole spectacle and still observing the individual players. Being right on the center isle, my wife, who is short, could see perfectly and was properly blown away by the experience. Thank you Mr Scalper!
PS. When the tour returned to Toronto outdoors at the Skydome/Rogers Centre, we bought cheaper tickets and enjoyed the distant experience of the sound and spectacle but I did not notice any surround sound.
Enter your email address to join: