Modern Day Warrior
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 31
Perhaps the recent surround releases by King Crimson have convinced Alex Lifeson that DVD-A is not a dirty word.
That and perhaps the preferred format of Steven Wilson also helped.
Perhaps the recent surround releases by King Crimson have convinced Alex Lifeson that DVD-A is not a dirty word.
That and perhaps the preferred format of Steven Wilson also helped.
The News release on Rush's site does not mention a DTS group, only Dolby as the dvd-video portion of the dvd-audio disc.
http://www.rush.com
I would say that it was no coincidence that Rush's first surround album would be "Moving Pictures".I know many others have read this article from Sound and Vision but one of surround's best champions had the Moving Pictures album listed in his wish list to be able to hear. So who knows maybe there is still hope for some of these classic albums to come out in surround.
Here's article:
http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/features/2009/12/20-albums-deserve-be-surround-sound
I don't trust ordering the cd\dvd as I doubt it will have DVDA layer going by track record(Snakes and Arrows 5.1-D only).peter
I would say that it was no coincidence that Rush's first surround album would be "Moving Pictures".
Steven Wilson + Alex Lifeson = Moving Pictures 5.1
I don't recall the advance press releases on Snakes and Arrows but if the CD/DVD Moving Pictures isn't dvd-audio then there is some big time BS going on. Everything we've seen in the news about Moving Pictures spells out "playable on dvd-audio players". Hard to imagine these guys don't know what they are talking about.
...If I recall correctly, the description of the blu-ray also makes it seem like it has a DVD-A layer too.
"Blu-ray discs will also feature DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 surround sound in addition to 96kHz/24-bit PCM 5.1 surround sound and stereo. "
How weird would that be?
Yeah, sorry, I should have been more specific and stated from the past (classic) catalog on the Mercury label.Snakes & Arrows? Though if you want to argue that it didn't count as is was crap, I would go with that.
They did everything except say specifically the disc itself includes a DVD-Audio layer. website states: "...will boast the 5.1 surround sound and stereo audio in 96kHz/24-bit high-resolution audiophile." This could mean only the stereo is 96/24, although that is unlikely. So, I have 90% confidence that it is a DVD-A, but I went with the Blu-Ray for the 100%! If I recall correctly, the description of the blu-ray also makes it seem like it has a DVD-A layer too.
"Blu-ray discs will also feature DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 surround sound in addition to 96kHz/24-bit PCM 5.1 surround sound and stereo. "
How weird would that be?
Any particular reason to choose one over the other if one's equipment is capable of playing and decoding both? I have no basis to compare MLP with DTS-HD Master.
I am in the top ranks of fanatical RUSH fans, so I'll probably end up with both, but I'm curious to hear any arguments for one over the other.
Thank you. The only confirmation that can top that is when we get the actual disc in our hands. Sing it now: How many times have we been misled by authors who don't understand?Amazon listing now states specifically in the title that it is DVD-Audio.
http://www.amazon.com/Moving-Pictur...=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1299273444&sr=8-3