Groovy Daniel
Member
I meant the RIAA equalization!!!!
RIAA equalization isn't a tremendous obstacle. If you look at the difference between RIAA EQ at normal speed and RIAA EQ at half speed and adjust it toward the mean, it's within roughly +/- 2dB across the frequency spectrum. While 2dB isn't insignificant, it's within the tolerance of the frequency response of typical cartridge/tonearm combinations, let alone the compromises afflicted upon an audio signal by disk mastering and vinyl playback. Vinyl (i.e., analog disk reproduction) is a horrible medium. The fact that it was the best available medium for commercial distribution of recorded sound up to 1982 when the CD arrived doesn't mean it was ever a faithful medium by modern standards. (I'd be happy to tick off the limitations of disk mastering and vinyl playback in a separate posting.) What vinyl is very good at, however, is providing a theoretical duplicate of the master disk, which is one generation removed from the master tape (but modified to accommodate the limitations of analog disk reproduction), and may be the best available source for vintage recordings, especially quadraphonic recordings whose master tapes may be lost or suffer from the "sticky shed syndrome" that affects much of the 1970s tape stock. My point is, the sonic signature of a vinyl recording should not be accepted as the definitive or "correct" sonic signature, because it's inherently compromised. The +/- 2dB in RIAA reproduction caused by 1/2 speed playback is insignificant compared to the EQ required to blow past the limitations of vinyl and disk mastering.