The Official QQ NFL Tailgate Thread

QuadraphonicQuad

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
That was also a controversial play :

After the play, a critical question remained: who did the football touch in the Fuqua/Tatum collision? If it bounced off Fuqua without ever touching Tatum, then Harris' reception was illegal. If the ball bounced off only Tatum or if it bounced off both Fuqua and Tatum (in any order) then the reception was legal. The rule stated in the pertinent part that if an offensive player touches a pass first, he is the only offensive player eligible to catch the pass. "However, if a [defensive] player touches [the] pass first, or simultaneously with or subsequent to its having been touched by only one [offensive] player then all [offensive] players become and remain eligible" to catch the pass.[14][15] (This rule was rescinded in 1978.) If the reception was illegal, the Raiders would have gained possession (by a turnover on downs), clinching the victory.

But that was the Jack Tatum Oakland Raiders; and everyone other than Raiders fans hated the Raiders. So regardless of whatever actually indeed happened, it was a legal play sanctioned by the powers of the universe. So there.
 
So there.
So Jets!
nfl schedule - Google Search

GO BILLS!
pj0hepffaebkrnxdqavz.jpg

The powers of the universe. So there.
 
That was also a controversial play :

After the play, a critical question remained: who did the football touch in the Fuqua/Tatum collision? If it bounced off Fuqua without ever touching Tatum, then Harris' reception was illegal. If the ball bounced off only Tatum or if it bounced off both Fuqua and Tatum (in any order) then the reception was legal. The rule stated in the pertinent part that if an offensive player touches a pass first, he is the only offensive player eligible to catch the pass. "However, if a [defensive] player touches [the] pass first, or simultaneously with or subsequent to its having been touched by only one [offensive] player then all [offensive] players become and remain eligible" to catch the pass.[14][15] (This rule was rescinded in 1978.) If the reception was illegal, the Raiders would have gained possession (by a turnover on downs), clinching the victory.
Yep. And the Raiders were also on the losing end of the tuck rule.
 
DateVisitorHomeResultBox Score
11/17/2024Kansas City Chiefs21@Buffalo Bills30WBox
01/21/2024 *Kansas City Chiefs27@Buffalo Bills24LBox
12/10/2023Buffalo Bills20@Kansas City Chiefs17WBox
10/16/2022Buffalo Bills24@Kansas City Chiefs20WBox
01/23/2022 *Buffalo Bills36@Kansas City Chiefs42L/OTBox
10/10/2021Buffalo Bills38@Kansas City Chiefs20WBox
01/24/2021Buffalo Bills24@Kansas City Chiefs38LBox
10/19/2020Kansas City Chiefs26@Buffalo Bills17LBox
11/26/2017Buffalo Bills16@Kansas City Chiefs10WBox
11/29/2015Buffalo Bills22@Kansas City Chiefs30LBox
11/09/2014Kansas City Chiefs17@Buffalo Bills13LBox
11/03/2013Kansas City Chiefs23@Buffalo Bills13LBox
09/16/2012Kansas City Chiefs17@Buffalo Bills35WBox
09/11/2011Buffalo Bills41@Kansas City Chiefs7WBox
10/31/2010Buffalo Bills10@Kansas City Chiefs13L/OTBox
12/13/2009Buffalo Bills16@Kansas City Chiefs10WBox
11/23/2008Buffalo Bills54@Kansas City Chiefs31WBox
11/13/2005Kansas City Chiefs3@Buffalo Bills14WBox
10/26/2003Buffalo Bills5@Kansas City Chiefs38LBox
11/17/2002Buffalo Bills16@Kansas City Chiefs17LBox
11/19/2000Buffalo Bills21@Kansas City Chiefs17WBox
09/14/1997Buffalo Bills16@Kansas City Chiefs22LBox
12/22/1996Kansas City Chiefs9@Buffalo Bills20WBox
10/30/1994Kansas City Chiefs10@Buffalo Bills44WBox
01/23/1994Kansas City Chiefs13@Buffalo Bills30WBox
11/28/1993Buffalo Bills7@Kansas City Chiefs23LBox
01/05/1992 *Kansas City Chiefs14@Buffalo Bills37WBox
10/07/1991Buffalo Bills6@Kansas City Chiefs33LBox
11/30/1986Buffalo Bills17@Kansas City Chiefs14WBox
09/28/1986Kansas City Chiefs20@Buffalo Bills17LBox
12/04/1983Buffalo Bills14@Kansas City Chiefs9WBox
09/12/1982Kansas City Chiefs9@Buffalo Bills14WBox
12/03/1978Buffalo Bills10@Kansas City Chiefs14LBox
10/01/1978Kansas City Chiefs13@Buffalo Bills28WBox
10/03/1976Kansas City Chiefs17@Buffalo Bills50W
10/29/1973Kansas City Chiefs14@Buffalo Bills23W
12/19/1971Buffalo Bills9@Kansas City Chiefs22L
12/07/1969Buffalo Bills19@Kansas City Chiefs22L
11/02/1969Kansas City Chiefs29@Buffalo Bills7L
10/05/1968Kansas City Chiefs18@Buffalo Bills7L
12/03/1967Buffalo Bills13@Kansas City Chiefs23L
01/01/1967Kansas City Chiefs31@Buffalo Bills7L
10/02/1966Buffalo Bills29@Kansas City Chiefs14W
09/11/1966Kansas City Chiefs42@Buffalo Bills20L
12/12/1965Kansas City Chiefs25@Buffalo Bills34W
10/17/1965Buffalo Bills23@Kansas City Chiefs7W
10/18/1964Buffalo Bills35@Kansas City Chiefs22W
09/13/1964Kansas City Chiefs17@Buffalo Bills34W
10/13/1963Buffalo Bills35@Kansas City Chiefs26W
09/22/1963Kansas City Chiefs27@Buffalo Bills27T
12/02/1962Dallas Texans14@Buffalo Bills23W
09/30/1962Buffalo Bills21@Dallas Texans41L
11/12/1961Buffalo Bills30@Dallas Texans20W
10/15/1961Dallas Texans24@Buffalo Bills27W
12/18/1960Buffalo Bills7@Dallas Texans24L
11/06/1960Dallas Texans45@Buffalo Bills28L
* AFC Divisional Playoff Game
† AFC Championship Game
‡ AFL Championship Game

Buffalo Bills lead series 30-25-1
Points Scored:
Buffalo Bills 1257, Kansas City Chiefs 1171
I'm not sure if you just have too much time on your hands. Or if you just discovered how to copy and paste.

Take a walk about tomorrow & check on your salmon farming.

Edit: Sorry my phone doesn't let me upload a fish & smiley face but you get the idea...
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure if you just have too much time on your hands. Or if you just discovered how to copy and paste.

Take a walk about tomorrow & check on your salmon farming.
On my case again? The post did not preview properly, time made me give up and leave it. Unwanted images only appeared on the final post. Bills rule is all you need to know. Take a walk in the snow and cold?? Leave the poor fish out of this. Go Chiefs!
14-0 Green Bay (say cheese, stay happy) Time is fast. . . :sleep:
 
Well men, what did you all think of the Packers performance 😊? The shut out was great but they could have played a lot better. Packers did what they had to do considering the competition!
Sorry if I sound unappreciative of the win, I'm not! I am their biggest critic & know they can do better. The Saints are a shell of a team. Really bad😣 That HC they have now should maybe stick to coaching the special teams🙃
...next it's on to the Vikings. Of course I'd like a win but I'm leaning towards a Minn. win.
Sorry Ricky.....🙁
I see the game has been moved from noon to 3:25pm so it will be the Sunday doubleheader game.
 
Last edited:
Well men, what did you all think of the Packers performance 😊? The shut out was great but they could have played a lot better. Packers did what they had to do considering the competition!
Sorry if I sound unappreciative of the win, I'm not! I am their biggest critic & know they can do better. The Saints are a shell of a team. Really bad😣 That HC they have now should maybe stick to coaching the special teams🙃
...next it's on to the Vikings. Of course I'd like a win but I'm leaning towards a Minn. win.
Sorry Ricky.....🙁
I see the game has been moved from noon to 3:25pm so it will be the Sunday doubleheader game.
Bobby
sorry. Did not invest the time to watch. Knew it was going to be a crappy one sided affair. Now lets hope the Packers bravado does not go to their
cheese ( heads }. You have a big game coming up. Never Let Me Down Again
By the way - Happy Holidays to all you wild and crazy QQ football freaks
 
Well men, what did you all think of the Packers performance 😊? The shut out was great but they could have played a lot better. Packers did what they had to do considering the competition!
Sorry if I sound unappreciative of the win, I'm not! I am their biggest critic & know they can do better. The Saints are a shell of a team. Really bad😣 That HC they have now should maybe stick to coaching the special teams🙃
...next it's on to the Vikings. Of course I'd like a win but I'm leaning towards a Minn. win.
Sorry Ricky.....🙁
I see the game has been moved from noon to 3:25pm so it will be the Sunday doubleheader game.
The Pack gets credit for the first shutout of the season. That’s something, even if it’s against the lowly Aint’s. I mean, the Jets haven’t been shut out, right ar?
 
The Pack gets credit for the first shutout of the season. That’s something, even if it’s against the lowly Aint’s. I mean, the Jets haven’t been shut out, right ar?
The Jets have not been shut out. The Jets have been in most of their games. That’s why I watch them.

Another intra-divisional game for the Bills this weekend…beware Bills.
 
Back
Top