I actually don't understand making Atmos versions of demos/out takes, raw studio recordings, etc.). Isn't the point to hear the raw unprocessed works in progress, why should we hear them each interpreted with different surround instrument placements, etc.
I like
Take 11 the best of
How Do You Sleep? so this goes to show that the final version is not always the best one IMO.
Take 1 is good also, see what I'm getting at?
Take 5&6, not bad either.
Before modern today, every demo was of a "lessor" quality, ie stereo (or mono) of every demo song on the planet so converting every demo song to atmos allows us to decide which version we think is the best, because, I hate to say it, but it's a bit of a moving target as you age and become more sophisticated (or less) at listening to music.
Edit: so I'm listening to
Imagine (Evolution Documentary) in ATMOS on this disc and it's incredible to hear how this song evolved (and Ringo taking credit for it lol) so this is exactly why Atmos'ing everything is the only true way to compare demos and outakes to the final released version in Atmos.
Listening to a final STEREO version
compared to all the demo and outtake versions in Atmos would be equally as guilty, right?
Listening to all 61 songs in atmos with all the pipe-ins (courtesy of Atmos) from the fab 4 is like watching Peter Jackson's documentary
Get Back, just in
pure audio
Without atmos'ing everything you would have never heard, and would have never known, nor would I
I have a rare
Johnny Cash Stereo Box Set from Germany that has prolly 61 songs like this set, but the fact that this set is
atmos'ed makes this set infinitely World's Beyond the
Cash stereo set.
50 year old
Beatles, 61 Songs, in
Atmos, what the hell is anyone complaining about?