Only just had a chance to listen to disc 1 so far just wanted to understand what the fuss was and totally agree what a week 5.1 mix not attempted to listen to the quadrasinic mix. No votes so far but need to understand what should or could be?
Hi All, I could not listen 5.1 mix of the out-takes of on my BD1.Both 5.1 & Stereo are available on the credit. Is that common phenomenon in all copies ?? What about your BD1?
I was very happy when I first got this and thought it was brilliant so I voted a 10!
But (even though it’s not possible) I’m increasing my vote to 11. The reason?! Well this is crazy (and it’s not because you just met me) it’s because either John Lennon is such a dude that -
1. He invited Aleksandr the Meetkat into the studio for the raw mix on Oh Yoko?
2. John Lennon is Aleksandr the Meerkat?!?!
If you listen to the first 10 seconds of Oh Yoko on the Raw Mix, you’ll hear him!
View attachment 37267
Apologies if you don’t know who Aleksandr the Meerkat is... But... Thinking about it - the most logical answer is John Lennon is Aleksandr the Meerkat!
Great album, great mix, great fidelity. One of the standout hits of the year...
Late to the game on this one: ordered on Black Friday, then had to send for a replacement that came yesterday (!). There's still something fishy with Blu-Ray #2, but none of that impacts my vote and I have managed to hear almost all the surround content in the set.
Speaking of which, I have to applaud the sheer amount of surround content in this set! How do you make all the outtakes and superfluous (IMO) extra material in a box set interesting to a surround collector? Mix it in surround! This is now something I'll be looking for in future big boxes, as the 5.1 outtakes ended up being the standout of the set.
First thing that jumps out at me is the size of the box- I wish all box sets were around this size. This is much more pleasant to store/look at compared to a behemoth like Pepper or Layla. The book gets extra points for the extensive quad info and those cool surround maps.
Quad Mix: I guess it's cool they threw this in. I always wondered why the SQ LP was such a lousy decode and now I know. What I found interesting were the quotes from Allan Steckler about the making of the quad mix in the book- seems they were going for a "U-shape" sound-field and not the "middle of the band" approach, so there was some intention behind the way it was done. Doubt I'll play this again.
5.1 Mix: Better than the quad, but still a real missed opportunity. Nice separation between the front three channels and I do like vocals isolated in the center. Unfortunately, all that makes it to the rears is cavernous reverb and the occasional accent instrument (tambourine, acoustic guitar, etc). The strings are in the phantom sides biased more toward the rears. The best mix is "How Do You Sleep" with the slide guitar directly behind you, just as the map shows. Overall, a very conservative surround mix- and it definitely doesn't help that the rears are mastered around 3 dB too low, much like the Sgt. Pepper 5.1.
Raw Studio Mixes: You've probably heard enough about these already. A "Columbia Q8" style presentation with the drums/bass in the rears and no reverb. Love it! Without a doubt the best part of this entire set. My only complaint would be that there is sometimes a "black hole" in the mix, with one channel (usually front left or right) barely used.
Final Vote: 9
View attachment 37365