Sadly, this is not the case as SACD is very expensive to replicate for some reason completely unknown to me.
DVD is a lot cheaper to actually manufacture.
Also, to the label there is absolutely no cost difference except authoring time, as a DVD5/9 is a DVD5/9 no matter what content is actually included.
We could easily get around the CD issue in one of 2 ways:
1 - do a CD/DVD double pack. This gives you both.
2 - include the CD resolution files as FLAC in a data section. Again, as for DVD-A/V over straight DVD-V, there is no cost implication.
@fredblue - DVD-A/V should indeed be the de facto standard for music releases. As you point out, it runs on all DVD players. I have heard it argued by labels that Hybrid SACD is better as it "does not need specialist hardware to run" (Deutsche Gramophon) yet what is an SACD player if not specialised hardware?
even though they are just DVDs essentially, don't you need a special "key" to get around Sony's SACD encryption/copy-protection bollocks, which is proprietary to them and expensive, in order to replicate them.. and that's why no pressing plants make the damn things anymore?
really? what a load of old shite! of course SACD is very specialised! that's part of its failure! people needed to buy new hardware all over again!
by the time I started seriously collecting DTS CDs I already had access to at least 6 different machines (CD & DVD players) that could play them back in some shape or form in 5.1.. and as for DVDA I was able to play all those back in DTS/DD long before I got a Universal player with DVDA Adv Res capabilities, even on my Mac -- and then enjoy them all over again in superior quality from the same disc once I'd gone DVDA! how much more "versatile" can you get!?
all I could do with my SACD discs before I got an SACD player was listen to the (often compressed & poorly remastered) redbook layer on the hybrid discs - and lovingly look at the single layer ones, or use them as expensive drinks coasters!
plus there are millions more players out there that are DVDA(compatible) than there are SACD capable.. The arguments against DVDA are just complete bull, I don't buy them at all.